Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sudhir S. Mehta v. Dy. CIT (2021) 85 ITR 8 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S.69C:Unexplained expenditure — Personal household expenses — Joint family — Expenses reduced by 50 Per Cent.

Shri Anant Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021)85 ITR 60 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits – Loan received through proper banking channel — Addition is held to be not justified .

Dy. CIT v. Pipal Tree Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 85 ITR 78/199 DTR 129 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Share Premium — Additional evidence – Assessing Officer was not given sufficient time – Matter remanded [ S.133 (6) R.46A ]

Spooner Industries P. Ltd. v ITO (2021) 85 ITR 44 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S.56: Income from other sources – Large share premium —Unquoted Equity Shares Discounted Free Cash Flow Method – Addition is not sustainable [ S. 56(2)(viib), R.11UA ] S.56: Income from other sources – Large share premium —Unquoted Equity Shares Discounted Free Cash Flow Method – Addition is not sustainable [ S. 56(2)(viib), R.11UA ]

Rajyalakshmi Reguraj v. ITO (2021) 85 ITR 20 (SN)(Bang) (Trib)

S.54F : Capital gains- Investment in a residential house -No clarity as regards date of utilisation of amounts and when assessee incurred expenditure for registration of property — Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for examination [ S.45 ]

Maurice Patrick De Rebello v .ITO (2021)85 ITR 17 (SN)(Bang) (Trib)

S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence – All flats received from builder under joint development agreement situated in same premises —Entitled to exemption on entire built-up area received [ S. 2(47)(v), 45, 54F ]

Sudhir S. Mehta v. Dy. CIT (2021) 85 ITR 8 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S.48 : Capital Gains — Computation – Cost of acquisition — Shares — Interest on investment disallowed will be part of cost of acquisition of shares for determining profit on sale of shares [ S.45, 57 ]

United Telelinks (Bangalore) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 85 ITR 36 (SN)(Bang) (Trib)

S. 40A(2): Expenses or payments not deductible – Excessive or unreasonable – Rent paid to daughter of managing Director- Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer [ S.40A(2)(b) ]

Orange Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021)85 ITR 33 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 40A(2): Expenses or payments not deductible – Excessive or unreasonable -775 Per Cent. increase in remuneration to Directors —Assessing Officer not pointing out comparables to demonstrate that salary paid to directors was excessive — No evasion of tax – CBDT circular No. 6-P dated July 6, 1968 is binding – No disallowance can be made [ S.40A(2)(b) ]

Shri Anant Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021)85 ITR 60 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S.37(1):Business expenditure —Proportionate drop in vehicle maintenance account in profit and loss statement — Addition not tenable.