CIT v. Ace India Abodes Ltd. (2018) 162 DTR 118 (Raj)(HC)

S. 40A(3) :Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits -20% expenditure -Purchase of land as stock in trade -Villagers paid the amount in cash in the absence of banking facilities deletion of addition was held to be justified [ R.6DD(h)]

Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Court held that the payment of cash was made to villagers for purchase of land as stock in trade . Villagers  were paid the amount in cash  in the absence of banking facilities  deletion of addition was held to be justified