The partner introduced the land which was held by him as capital asset to the firm as stock in trade at nil value in the assessment year 2011-12 . In the assessment year 2013 -14 the firm revalued the assets and credited in the account of the partner at Rs . 13.96 crores. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment of the partner and charged the capital gains at Rs 13-96 in the hands of the partner in the Assessment year 2013 -14 . On appeal the CIT(A) deleted the addition on the ground that the asset was transferred in the assessment year 2011 -12 and not in the assessment year 2013 -14 . On appeal by the Revenue , Tribunal dismissing the appeal of the Revenue , held that section 45(3) does not seek to substitute by any other figure the value agreed between the partners at which the asset is transferred to the firm . As the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed , other legal grounds on reassessment was not dealt with . ( ITA No. 1658/Mum/ 2023 / CO.No.83/Mum/2023 dt 21 -12 -2023 , Bench “A” ) ( AY. 2013 -14 )