A notice under section 127(2) was also issued upon assessee to transfer his case from Mumbai to Bengaluru and an order of transfer was passed . On writ the court held that the revenue had only narrated facts but had not given any reasons why assessee’s case was to be transferred to Bengaluru . Both assessee and firm in which assessee was partner were assessed in Mumbai . Court also held that pendency of a case before Addl. CMM could not be a reason for transfer of assessee’s assessment from Mumbai to Bengaluru . Accordingly the order of transfer of assessee’s case passed under section 127 was to be set aside.
Divesh Prakashchand Jain v PCIT (2022) 445 ITR 496 /285 Taxman 206 (Bom)(HC))
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases – Transfer of case from Mumbai to Bangalore- No reason was recorded – Order of transfer of case was set aside [ S. 127(2), Art , 226 ]