Gopal Agarwal v. ITO (2025) 121 ITR 74 (SN) (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 271B: Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Failure to furnish audit report-Principles of natural justice Quantum assessment-Turnover-Gross receipts-Opportunity of hearing-Matter remanded to the file of CIT A). [S 44AB, 250]

Penalty under section 271B cannot be sustained without first adjudicating the assessee’s appeal against the quantum assessment where the very applicability of section 44AB is disputed. Since the assessee contended that he was not carrying on business requiring tax audit and the Commissioner (Appeals) decided the penalty appeal without first determining the turnover and gross receipts in the quantum appeal, besides issuing only one notice, thereby violating the principles of natural justice, the order was set aside and the matter restored to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after deciding the quantum appeal. (AY. 2018-19)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*