In this case the Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is holding more than one property which was not disputed by either of the party. The Tribunal in case of Laxman Singh Rawat ITA nos. 1668 & 2256/Del/2013 held that the expression “a residential house” would mean more than one residential house after taking into account the amendment to S. 54 which is apt in the present case. Further, the amendment has been brought in S. 54 to limit the exemption u/s 54 to one Residential unit, which is applicable from A.Y. 2015-16. (AY. 2012-13)
Harbinder Singh Chimni v. Dy. CIT (2018) 68 ITR 73 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence -More than one house – Amendment brought in S.. 54 to limit the exemption to one Residential unit is applicable from AY .2015-16 on wards. [S. 45]