The assessee-company was a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC) and during the year under consideration was engaged in the business of share broking and sub-broking, finance, etc . The AO made addition on account of share capital and premium and also on account of unsecured loan. CIT (A) deleted the addition . Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee had submitted complete details of bank account particulars, PAN, ITRs and financials etc. of share applicants . In response to notice issued under S. 133(6), share applicants had confirmed investment made by them in assessee-company along with source of their investment . Accordingly the Appellate Tribunal held that mere non-production of directors, without bringing any contrary material on record, could not be adversely viewed against assessee (AY .2012 13 )
ITO v. Commitment Financial Services (P.) Ltd. (2020) 181 ITD 682 / 113 taxmann.com 565 (Delhi) (Trib)
S.68: Cash credits -Share capital- Furnished details of bank account, PAN, ITRs and financials etc. of share applicants- In response to notice issued under S. 133(6), share applicants had confirmed investment made by them along with source of their investment- Mere non-production of directors, without bringing any contrary material on record -Addition is held to be not valid .[ S.133(6 ) ]