On the basis of observation made by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the assessment of company in which assessee was director held that erstwhile directors had received a certain sum each by way of repayment of loan taken from escrow agent which would have to be considered for assessment in their hands under section 28(iv) of the Act. On basis of said order, section 148 notice was issued to assessee. On writ the assessee made a submission that he was not a director of company at that time, and without even hearing him and not providing any opportunity to defend his case, order was passed disposing the objections. Dismissing the petition the Court held that disputed facts could not be adjudicated in writ proceedings, all such disputed facts were to be verified by competent authority and, thus, initiation of reassessment was justified. (AY. 2009-10)
K. Rajesh v. ACIT (2021) 283 Taxman 153 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Value of any benefit or perquisites-On the basis of observation by the CIT (A)-Repayment of loan-Disputed facts cannot be adjudicated in writ proceedings-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 28(iv), 148, 151, Art. 226]