Kirti Singh v. ACIT (2024) 231 TTJ 1051 / 242 DTR 269 / 204 ITD 487 / 38 NYPTTJ 180 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Search and seizure-Gold found during search-1300 grams-Status of family-Addition is deleted. [S. 132]

Held that the assessee and her family members being high net worth individuals, the whole of the gold ornaments of 1300 gms found at the time of search are to be treated as clearly explained as per CBDT Instruction No. 1916, dt. 11th May, 1994 and, therefore, the impugned addition under s. 69A is not sustainable.  Followed Ashok Chaddha v. ITO (2011) 63 DTR  353 /245 CTR 416(Delhi)(HC)   (AY. 2021-22)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*