Assessment of assessee was reopened for relevant assessment years due to survey proceedings.  Assessee appealed these orders, and during pendency of appeal, requested a stay of demand.  Initially, authority ordered assessee to deposit 20 per cent of demand before considering appeal. Assessee challenged this decision, citing lack of judicial scrutiny. Court agreed, ordering reconsideration (Kunj Bihari Lal Agarwal v. PCIT (2024) 464 ITR 738  (Raj)(HC)). Subsequently, authority revised deposit requirement to 10 per cent  Assessee filed another writ petition alleging that various figures and details which were given by him had not received consideration  High Court  held that authority had not restricted relief to 20 per cent but had granted stay subject to deposit of only 10 per cent of demand based on order of assessment (AY. 2014-15,  2016-17, 2020-21)