Following the judgment in Godrej Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT, [2024] 160 taxmann.com 13 (Bom)(HC) it was held that the validity of a notice had to be tested with reference to the law existing on the date of its issuance and, under the Finance Act, 2021, a notice under section 148 for AY 2014-15 could not be issued on or after 1-4-2021 by virtue of the first proviso to section 149. Accordingly, the orders under section 148A(d) and notices under section 148 were quashed and set aside. (AY. 2014-15)
Labh Investment v. ITO [2025] 170 taxmann.com 628 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-For AY 2014-15, no notice under section 148 could be issued on or after 1-4-2021 in view of the first proviso to section 149; reopening notice issued on 31-7-2022 was therefore barred by limitation. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), TOLA, Art. 226]
Leave a Reply