Dismissing the petition the Court held that the assessee was afforded an opportunity of hearing before taking recourse to sub-section (2A) of section 142 directing the assessee for special audit. A questionnaire was also issued under section 142(1). These facts nullified the contention of the assessee that it had no effective opportunity of hearing. The reply was not found satisfactory because the assessee had not maintained its books of account accurately and had not followed the accounting principles correctly and the nature of accounts being complex and bulky had led the Department to take recourse to compulsory audit. The order directing special audit need not be interfered with. (AY.2017-18)
Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam v. PCIT (2021) 430 ITR 41/276 Taxman 384/ 199 DTR 132 / 204 DTR 268/ 319 CTR 108 (MP)(HC)
S. 142(2A) : Inquiry before assessment-Special audit-Nature of business and volume and complexity of accounts and multiplicity of transactions-Order directing special audit is proper. [S. 142(1), Art. 226]