This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Accumulation of income-Educational purpose-Board resolution-Providing scholarship-Form No 10B-Entitled to claim benefit of section 11(2).[S.11(2), Form No 10]

Imperial College India Foundation v. Income-tax Officer (E) (2025) 214 ITD 761 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Accumulation of income-Amendment brought in by Finance Act, 2022, did not debar assessee from availing said time window in respect of existing accumulations and amendment had to be read prospectively in respect of fresh accumulations for the period pertaining to previous year starting from 1-4-2022 onwards. [S.11(3)(c)]

Meshri Mahajan Vanda. v. ITO (2025) 214 ITD 638 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(ii): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Salaries-Non-resident-Employed with TCS Malaysia-Rendered his services in Malaysia-Taxable in Malaysia even though the same was received in India-DTAA-India-Malaysia [S.5(2) Art. 16]

Arumugam Rajasekar. v. ITO (2025) 214 ITD 234 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Clerical omission, deduction was claimed under section 10(23C)(iiiad) instead of the correct section 10(23C)(vi)-Order of Assessing Officer rejecting the request for rectification was set aside. [S. 10(23C)(iiiad), 10(23C)(vi), 11,12, 12AA Form No.10B]

Om Charitable Chikitsa Samiti v. Assessing Officer (E) (2025) 214 ITD 633 (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Delay in filing application-No mala fide conduct or gross negligence-Delay was condoned-Matter was remanded to the file of CIT (E). [S.10(23C)(5)]

Chetana. v. CIT (E) (2025) 214 ITD 91 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vii):Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Income from providing centralized group services such as communication, marketing, strategy, HR, treasury, finance-Taxable in India as fees for technical services-Guarantee fee from its Indian subsidiaries for providing corporate and performance guarantees, since providing guarantees was not a regular business activity but an obligation arising from parent–subsidiary relationship, such fee was taxable in India as other income-DTAA-India-Finland.[Art. 7, 12, 21]

Metso OYJ. v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 214 ITD 533 (Kol) (Trib.)

S. 4: Charge of income-tax-Subsidy-Industrial Promotional Subsidy from State Government-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) for adjudication afresh.[S. 2(24)(viii)]

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 214 ITD 193 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 4: Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue-Subsidy-Income received on sale of Market Linked Focus Product Scheme (MLFPS) scrips was a capital receipt.[S. 2(24)(xviii) 28(i)]

DCIT v. Armstrong Knitting Mills. (2025) 214 ITD 219 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e): Deemed dividend-Advance salary to director-Disallowance cannot be made.

Patidar Builder (P.) Ltd. v. Assessing Officer (2025) 214 ITD 77 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 2(14)(iii) : Capital asset-Agricultural land-Capital gains-Failed to prove that distance from municipal limits exceeded 8 kms,-land constituted capital asset under section 2(14) and liable to capital gains tax.[S. 2(14),2(14)(iii)(b), 45]

Natesan Ekambaram. v. DCIT (2025) 214 ITD 615 (Chennai)(Trib.)