This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Jurisdictional validity of assessment order in question due to absence of transfer order under section 127-Commissioner (Appeals) passing order without adjudicating jurisdictional issue despite pending High Court directions-Matter restored to file of Commissioner (Appeals). [S. 127, 143(3), 144B]

DCIT v. Consulting Engineering Services (India) P. Ltd. (2025) 132 ITR 206 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 194LBC : Deduction of tax at source-Payments to investors in securitisation trust-Excess interest spread paid to originator by assessee, a securitisation trust-Originator not an “investor”-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 115TCA, 201(1)]

ITO v. Syamantaka IFMR Capital 2017 (2025) 132 ITR 61(Mum) (Trib.)

S. 194LBC : Deduction of tax at source-Income in respect of investment in securitisation trust-Definitions of “investor” and “securitised debt instrument”-Originator not holding any pass-through certificates of securitisation trust-Where minimum retention requirement commitment is met via other permissible alternative, originator does not hold instrument in securitisation trust and cannot be reckoned as investor-Assessee not “assessee-in-default”. [S. 115TCA, 201(1), 201(1A)]

Vivriti Cibus 013 2017 v. ITO (2025) 132 ITR 29(Mum) (Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Cash found at assessee’s residence claimed to belong to third party (H group)-H group also claiming the sum and seeking advance tax credit thereof-Same amount cannot be taxed twice-Matter remanded for verification-Income disclosed before Settlement Commission spread year-wise-Petition rejected-Same income taxed again for assessment year 2014-15-Double taxation-Matter remanded for de novo assessment. [S. 132, 132(4), 245D(1)]

Sachin Vilas Chaugule v. CIT (2025) 132 ITR 153 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-Condition precedent-Tangible material to reopen assessment-Assessing Officer seeking to verify computation of total income-No new material to show escapement of income-Reassessment not sustainable. [S. 143(3), 148]

DCIT v. DRS Logistics P. Ltd. (2025) 132 ITR 67(Hyd)(Trib.)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment-Limitation-Assessing Officer required to complete assessment within one month from the end of the month in which directions of Dispute Resolution Panel received-Directions of Panel dated 21-9-2021-Final order passed on 18-11-2021, after due date of 31-10-2021-Time-barred-Final assessment order void ab initio. [S. 92CA(3), 92CA(5), 144C(5), 144C(13)]

Rolls Royce India P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 1 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Advertising, marketing and promotion expenses-No agreement with associated enterprise to share/reimburse expenses-Not an international transaction-Addition not justified.-Royalty for trademark separate from royalty for technology-Cannot be clubbed-Adjustment on royalty for technology deleted-Arms length price-To be determined only by one of five prescribed methods-Ad hoc estimation of salary and man-hours not permissible-Adjustment deleted-Income-Disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income-Sufficient own funds available-No disallowance warranted-Direct/indirect expenses remitted for verification-Business loss-Foreign exchange loss on forward contracts terminated by bank on/after maturity, not prematurely cancelled by assessee-Integral to export of goods-Allowable as business loss-Special deduction-Allocation of operating and establishment expenses on ratio of unit’s revenue to total revenue-Method consistently accepted in earlier years-Deduction allowable-Interest-No delay in filing return-No interest under section 234A-Interest under section 234C levied on assessed income instead of returned income-Matter remitted for recomputation. [S. 14A, R. 8D, 28(i),80IC, 234A, 234C]

Mondelez India Foods P. Ltd. (formerly known as Cadbury Ltd.) v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 83 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits –Demonetisation-Cash deposits in bank during demonetisation period-Explanation that deposits were from recorded cash sales-Stocks existing on date of sale, no backdating-Complete stock tally maintained, books audited, no deviation in gross profit ratio, parties identified, proper invoices and VAT returns filed-No evidence of bogus sales-Cash deposits cannot be treated as unexplained income. [S. 115BBE]

Lalit R Jagawat HUF v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 192 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 43B : Deduction only on actual payment-Rectification of mistakes-Gratuity amount incorrectly claimed under wrong schedule in return-Not reflected in tax audit report-Centralised Processing Centre disallowing claim under section 143(1)-Assessee filing revised tax audit report-Genuine claim could not be denied-CBDT Circular-Income of assessee should not be over-assessed-Legitimate deduction not to be denied merely because of a mistake made by assessee. [S. 143(1), 154]

National Contracting Co. (India) P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 185 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 43B : Deduction only on actual payment-Unpaid interest on loan from World Bank-Section 43B(d), (da), (e) covering only interest payable to specific financial institutions, non-banking financial companies, scheduled banks or co-operative banks-World Bank or State Government loans not included-Disallowance deleted-Deduction only on actual payment-Statutory liability-Electricity duty collected from consumers but not remitted to Government-Assessee merely a conduit between consumer and Government-No independent liability-Disallowance rightly deleted.[S.43B(a), 43B(d), 43B(da), 43B(e)]

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 134 (Jaipur) (Trib.)