This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 145: Method of accounting-Estimation of profit-Decline in gross profit margin-No specific defects or discrepancies in books of account-Appeal of revenue dismissed.

ACIT v. Anant Commodities (P.) Ltd. (2025) 214 ITD 68 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Dividend-Rate of tax-Singapore tax resident-Mistakenly offered non-taxable capital gains and excess tax on dividends-Assessing Officer and DRP ignored correction request, citing lack of jurisdiction-Tribunal held that DRP can examine such issues under section 144C(8)-Tribunal restored matter to Assessing Officer to verify and allow relief if admissible-DTAA-India-Singapore [S.9(1)(i) 144C(8), Art.10]

Jubin Jehnbux Gandevia. v. ITO (IT) (2025) 214 ITD 590 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Amalgamation-Non-existent entity-Draft assessment order was passed in the name of a non-existent entity despite the Assessing Officer having been duly informed of amalgamation-Void-ab-initio. [S. 144C (5),292B]

Man Energy Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 214 ITD 491 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Limited Scrutiny-Depreciation-Goodwill-Increase in share capital-Assessing Officer could not have enlarged scope of limited scrutiny to full scrutiny without prior approval of Jurisdictional Commissioner-Addition made by Assessing Officer disallowing depreciation on goodwill was quashed.[S. 32, 143(2)]

Sagarlaxmi Agriseeds (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 214 ITD 204 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 143(1)(a): Assessment-Intimation-Prima facie adjustment Leave encashment-CPC, while processing a return under section 143(1) cannot make any adjustment without issuing any prior intimation as contemplated under the first proviso to section 143(1)(a).[S.10(10AA(ii)]

Kailash Narayan Shridhar. v. DCIT (2025) 214 ITD 547 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 124: Jurisdiction of Assessing Officers-Reassessment –Notice-Transfer of case-AIR information-Purchase of property-ITO, Bareilly issued notice-Not designated Assessing Officer-Mere mention of a Bareilly address in sale deed could not confer jurisdiction-Notice was quashed as beyond jurisdictional competence and therefore non-est in law-Assessment order was quashed. [S. 124, 144, 147, 148]

Poonam Sen. v. ITO (2025) 214 ITD 50 (Lucknow) (Trib.)

S.92BA: Transfer pricing-Specified domestic transaction-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-Firm-Partner-Capital contribution from partner-Failure to give comparable-Assessing Officer valued at a lower rate based on cost of construction-Addition was affirmed.

Dhara Developers v. ITO (2025) 214 ITD 692 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S.89A: Relief from taxation in income from retirement benefit account maintained by notified country-Denial of relief-Filed Form No. 10EE for assessment year 2022-23-Option exercised therein would continue to apply to all subsequent years-It would not be mandatory for assessee to file said Form afresh for every assessment year to claim relief under section 89A.[R. 21AAA, Form No 10EE]

Jignesh Naresh Jariwala. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 585 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 80P: Co-operative societies-Interest from Nationalised banks-Income from other sources-Proportionate expenditure-The matter was remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification. [S. 56, 57, 80P(2)(d)]

Kheralu Taluka Primary Teachers Co. Op. Credit Society Niyamit.v. NFAC (2025) 214 ITD 420 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 80JJAA: Employment of new workmen –Form No.10DA-Filed along with revised return-Report of accountant in Form No. 10DA was available before the Assessing Officer at the time of processing the revised return-Entitled to claim deduction-Matter was remanded for limited verification.[S.139(1), Form No 10DA]

Jubilant Food works Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 214 ITD 361 (Delhi) (Trib.)