This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Appeal filed after expiry of time limit-Revision application is held to be valid. [S. 143(1)(a), 246A, 264(4), Art. 226]
Aafreen Fatima Fazal Abbas Sayed v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 504 / 202 DTR 1/ 280 Taxman 429 / 321 CTR 583(Bom.)(HC)
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Jurisdiction limited to correcting error apparent on face of record-Tribunal cannot review its earlier order or rectify error of law or reappreciate facts. [S. 253, 254(1), 260A]
Vrundavan Ginning and Oil Mill v. Assistant Registrar (2021) 434 ITR 583/ 205 DTR 46 / 323 CTR 1067/ ( 2020) 284 Taxman 410 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Contradiction in earlier order-No error apparent on record-Tribunal wrongly recalled the order-Failure by Tribunal to consider applicability of explanation to Section 271(1) (c)-Rectification is held to be not valid. [S. 271(1)(c)]
P.T. Manuel and Sons v. CIT (2021) 434 ITR 416 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Limitation-Actual date of receipt of order of Tribunal. [S. 253, 268]
Anil Kumar Nevatia v. ITO (2021) 434 ITR 261 / 203 DTR 92 / 278 Taxman 235/ 321 CTR 368 (Cal.)(HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Power-Order of remand case is not valid-Remand without considering additional grounds is held to be not valid.
Ratanchand Manoharmal v. ITO (2021) 434 ITR 573/ 281 Taxman 513 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Telescoping of expenses-Benefit of matching principle-Appeal of revenue-Contention not considered by Tribunal-Matter remanded to Tribunal. [S. 40A(3) 132, 153A, 253]
H. Nagaraja v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 97 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 245R : Advance rulings-Questions raised in application pending before Income-Tax Authority for different years-Application not maintainable. [S. 245R(2)]
XYZ INC In re. (2021)434 ITR 49 / 200 DTR 17 / 320 CTR 270 (AAR)
S. 245R : Advance rulings-Applicant is not found to be real owner of the transactions-Transactions were designed prima facie for avoidance of tax.-Application is rejected-DTAA-India-Israel. [S. 9(1)(i), 9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), 245N(a)(ii), 245R(2)]
BP Israel, In re (2021) 434 ITR 283 (AAR)
S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Full and true disclosure of income-Not disclosing the income discovered during search-Acceptance of application is held to be not valid-Writ petition is held to be maintainable-Order is held to be perverse. [S. 132, 153A, 245D, Art. 226]
CIT v. ITSC (2021) 434 ITR 546 / 205 DTR 305/ 322 CTR 517 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Mere entries in accounts-No accrual of income-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 40(a)(i), 40(a)(ia), 192, 194C, 201(IA)
Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (TDS)-LTU (2021) 434 ITR 719/ 205 DTR 395/ 322 CTR 452/ 281 Taxman 527 (Karn.)(HC)