This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure to disclose true facts-Share capital-Kolkata based companies-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 143(1), 148, Art. 226]

Navnidhi Dyeing and Printing Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 334 / 201 DTR 265 / 320 CTR 737 / 281 Taxman 542(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No payment of interest or remuneration-Notice on ground that payments must have been made-Not valid. [S. 80(IB)(10), 148, Art. 226]

Myhome Developers v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 270 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Policed diamonds-Subsequent information-Transaction disclosed in the original assessment proceedings were not valid-Sanction obtained-Reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 132, 148, 151, Art. 226]

Madhav Gems Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021)434 ITR 684 / 200 DTR 297(2022) 325 CTR 489 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Facts disclosed in the original assessment proceedings were false-Notice is held to be valid [S.148, Art, 226]

Keshav Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021)434 ITR 700 (Guj) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Report of investigation wing-Non application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Notice not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Alliance Filaments Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 537 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Arm’s length price-Objection considered by the Dispute Resolution panel-Alternative remedy-Every error of an authority is not open to judicial review merely by terming it a “jurisdictional error”, although it may, at a later stage, be set aside for being erroneous-Writ is not maintainable [S. 92C, 92CA, 144C(5), 253, Art. 14, 19(1)(g), 226, 265]

Sabic India Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI (2021) 434 ITR 563 / 280 Taxman 158/ 207 DTR 193/ 323 CTR 325 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Assessing Officer can issue more than one notices-Writ is not maintainable to quash third notice. [Art. 226]

Sumandeep Vidyapeeth v. ACIT (2021)434 ITR 433 / 200 DTR 393 / 320 CTR 464 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 132 : Search and seizure-Warrant of Authorisation-Search proceedings against company-Application of mind-Warrant of Authorisation is held to be valid. [Art. 226]

Ajay Kumar Singh v. DGI(Inv.) (2021) 434 ITR 352 / 320 CTR 858 / 277 Taxman 633 (Pat.)(HC)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Amount disallowed u/s. 14A cannot be included. [S. 14A]

Sobha Developers Ltd. v. Dy.CIT(LTU) (2021) 434 ITR 266 / 278 Taxman 338 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Captive service provider-Depreciation-Transfer pricing officer to exclude depreciation from cost and Comparables. [S. 32, R 10B(1)(e)]

PCIT v. Novell Software Development (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2021)434 ITR 154/ 202 DTR 370/ 278 Taxman 390 / 321 CTR 458(Karn.) (HC)