This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment -Filing of return not an admission that notice is valid-Exempt from filing of return-Investment in subsidiary did not give rise to taxable income-Re assessment notice is held to be not valid. [S. 115A(5), 148, Art.226]

Nestle SA v. ACIT (2019) 417 ITR 213/ 311 CTR 344/181 DTR 211 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment -Deemed dividend- Advances received from company-Two partners are shareholders with substantial interest-Reassessment is held to be valid. [S. 2(22)(e), 148 ]

Aswani Enterprises v. ACIT ( 2018) 100 taxmann.com 178/ (2019) 417 ITR 223 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial: SLP dismissed, Aswani Enterprises v .ACIT (2023)456 ITR 33 /294 Taxman 435 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Shah Commission’s report- Cash credit -Under-invoicing -Merely on basis of Shah Commission’s Report opining that there was under-invoicing of export price by iron-ore miners and exporters, reassessment could not be initiated when there was nothing to indicate that any particular income had accrued to anyone as a result of price difference-Notice based on report of commission is held to be not valid. [S. 28(1) , 68 ,148]

Sesa Sterlite Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 417 ITR 334 / 267 Taxman 275 /181 DTR 290 (Bom.)(HC). Editorial : Notice issued in SLP ACIT v. V.M. Salgaocar Sales International (2021) 283 Taxman 192 (SC)/ ( 2022) 284 Taxman 373 / 289 Taxman 74(SC)

S. 133A : Power of survey–Unexplained investment-Statement in the course of survey–Documents discovered in the course of survey-Failure to explain the source satisfactorily–Addition is held to be valid. [S. 69, 132, 133A(3)(iii)]

C. K. Abdul Azeez. v. CIT (2019) 417 ITR 363 / 182 DTR 283/ 267 Taxman 553/ 311 CTR 489(Ker.)(HC)

S. 132A : Powers-Requisition of seized assets-Cash seized under guidelines issued by Election Commission-Election commission finding that seizure was not valid-Income-Tax Authorities had no jurisdiction to requisition such cash. [S.132, Art.226]

Indian Traders v. State of Bihar (2019) 417 ITR 95 (Pat.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing–Arm’s length price–Comparables-Companies large and functionally distinct with different areas of development and services-Cannot be benchmarked or equated-Exclusion of three comparables-Held to be valid. [S. 92CA]

CIT v. Symphony Marketing Solutions India P. Ltd. (2019) 417 ITR 289 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 80HH : Newly established industrial undertakings-Dipping plant-Manufacture- Manufacturing cloth industrial fabrics, readymade garments sewing threads etc-Entitle to deduction. [S. 2(29B)]

Madura Coats P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 417 ITR 115 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Loan–Onus not discharged–Addition is held to be justified.[S. 69]

Sajid Khan v. PCIT (2019) 417 ITR 1 / 311 CTR 725/ 183 DTR 417/( 2020) 268 Taxman 97(All.)(HC)

S. 45 : Capital gains–Transfer–Allotment letter-Long term-Short term-Assessee in possession of sheds since date of allotment-Assessee Paying Amounts Due Under Agreement-Sale deed executed on 11-1-1996-Transfer of sheds in same year-Assessable as long-term capital gains. [S.2(42A), 2(47)(v)]

South India Minerals Corporation v. ACIT (2019) 417 ITR 306/ 266 Taxman 16 / 311 CTR 995/ 184 DTR 306(Mad.)(HC)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment- Entry tax is held to be allowable as deduction.

CIT v. TVS Motors Ltd. (2019) 417 ITR 236 (Mad.)(HC)