This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 194A : Deduction at source – Interest other than interest on securities – No liability to deduct tax based on the specific exclusion provided to the assessee under section 194A(3)(v) – Provisions would not apply [S. 40(a)(ia), 194A(3)(i)(b) , 194A(3)(v)]

PCIT v. Goa State Co-operative Bank Ltd (2021) 318 CTR 497 / 197 DTR 305 / 110 CCH 54 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment – Income of any other person – Search
The materials seized did not indicate any inflation of purchase expenses- Assessment is held to be bad in law. [S.12AA, 132 ]

PCIT.v. S.R.Trust (2021) 123 taxmann.com 311 / 277 Taxman 133 (Mad)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment – Search or requisition – Objections raised by the Assessee – Rejected with reasons – No violation of Principles of Natural Justice.[ Art . 226 ]

M. Vivek v. Dy.CIT (2021) 197 DTR 12/ 318 CTR 270 (Mad) (HC )

S. 147 : Reassessment – Within four years – High Court directed AO to re-look at the matter in light of the declaratory and curative amendment in 40(a)(ia) being retrospective from 1-4-2005 [S. 40(a)(ia), 148 , 194C, Art , 226 ]

Sima Agencies v. ITO (2021) 318 CTR 516 / 198 DTR 33 / 110 CCH 52/ 279 Taxman 171 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment – After the expiry of four years- No failure to disclose any tangible material – Reassessment is held to be bad in law .[S. 40(b)(ia) , 148]

Devebhai Mafatlal Patel v. ACIT (2021) 318 CTR 722 / 110 CCH 53 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Where the matter was remanded by the ITAT for de novo assessment, the entire procedure under 144C had to be followed .[ S.254 (1) ]

PCIT v. Headstrong Services India Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 197 DTR 329 /318 CTR 369 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets – High court could not direct release of gold in favour of the alleged owner when appeal before the CIT(A) was pending.[S.250, Art .226 ]

New Lakshmi Jewellers v. PCIT (2021) 431 ITR 570/318 CTR 713 / 278 Taxman 403/200 DTR 264(Bom) (HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – Rejection of comparables is a finding of fact- Appellate Tribunal – Decision of High Court is available – Remad is not justified – Additional evidence is produced -Remand is justified . [ S.92B, 254(1) ]

Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 431 ITR 483 /197 DTR 409 / 318 CTR 654 / 2023) 153 taxmann.com 199 (Delhi) (HC)/ Editorial ,SLP of Revenue dismissed ,PCIT v. Microsoft India (R&D) (P.) Ltd ( 2023) 294 Taxman 342 ( SC)/ PCIT v. Microsoft India (R And D) Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 464 ITR 587 (SC)

S. 68: Cash credits – Opening stock accepted in scrutiny – Sales made from opening stock cannot be treated as bogus. [S. 56, 133A]

PCIT v. Akshit Kumar (2021) 197 DTR 121 /318 CTR 26 / 277 Taxman 423 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 57 : Income from other sources – Deductions –AO is not justified in disallowing claim for deduction u/s 57(iii) for interest paid when Assessee given names of lenders, loans were availed through banking channels and interest paid was allowed as deduction from year to year – Matter remanded to AO.[ S.57(iii) ]

Rajendra Kumar Jain .v. ITO (2020) 120 taxmann.com 293 / (2021) 277 Taxman 236 (Mad) (HC)