This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Cash credits-Shell Companies-Information from Investigation Wing-Recorded reason mechanical manner without application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Mistake-A mistake, which can be corrected under section 292B, should be such that if excised it does not change tenor and scope of documents/proceedings referred to therein-Order of Tribunal quashing the reassessment order is affirmed-No substantial question of law.[S. 68, 143(1), 148, 260A, 292B]

CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd (2023) 153 taxmann.com 641 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Delay of 213 days, SLP of Revenue is dismissed as the delay is not satisfactorily explained, CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 102 (SC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained expenditure-Prior period items and advertisement expenses-No new tangible material-Quashing of reassessment by the Tribunal is affirmed. [S.69C, 148, 260A]

PCIT v. Samsung India Electronics (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 21 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Manufacturing and cut of polished diamond on job work basis and trading of diamonds and power generation through windmill-Amalgamation-No failure to disclose material facts-reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S.80IA(4)(iv) 143(3), 148, Form No.10CCB, Art. 226]

Facets Gems Polishing Works (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 168 (Guj.)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 48, 148, Art. 226]

Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel v. ITO (2023) 151 taxmann.com 121 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, ITO v. Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel (2024) 300 Taxman 96 (SC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Income from other sources-Interest income-Credit for Tax deducted at source-Change of opinion-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 56, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Rushil Decor Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 432 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Depreciation-Foreign exchange fluctuations on imported machinery-Project development-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32, 115JB, 148, Art. 226]

Adani Power Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 300 Taxman 484 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained money-Information from the ADIT (Investigation)-Purchases and sale of commodities through National Multi-Commodities Exchange (NMCE platform)-Borrowed satisfaction-Not valid in the eyes of law-Non application of mind-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 69A, 148, Art. 226]

Toral Hemanshubhai Shah v. Asst. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 196 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Development agreement-Capital gain tax-Granted a licence to developer-Issue was consideration before the Assessing Officer-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 2(47)(v), 45, 148, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S.53A, Art. 226]

Darshana Anand Damle v.Dy.CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 240/ 459 ITR 60(Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, Dy. CIT v. Darshana Anand Damle (2024) 300 Taxman 108 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Special category states-Assessing Officer applied his mind-Proceeding to reopen assessment was actuated merely by a change of opinion and, hence, impugned notice was set aside-Time limit to issue of notice-Sanction obtained satisfaction of Additional Commissioner, an authority who is not covered by provision of section 151(1), as it stood on 1-1-2019, proceeding initiated against assessee-Issuance of notice under section 148 is held to be not in accordance with law-SLP of Revenue is dismissed on account of gross delay of 294 days. Revenue could not explain the delay satisfactorily.[S. 80IC, 148, 149, 151(1), Art.136]

UOI v. Dhansri Roller Flour Mills (2024) 300 Taxman 106 (SC) Editorial : Dhansri Roller Flour Mills v. UOI (2023) 293 Taxman 716 /335 CTR 328 /(2024) 460 ITR 326 (Gauhati)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Cash credits-Shell companies-Information from Investigation Wing-Recorded reason mechanical manner without application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Mistake-A mistake, which can be corrected under section 292B, should be such that if excised it does not change tenor and scope of documents/proceedings referred to therein-Order of Tribunal quashing the reassessment order is affirmed by the High Court as no substantial question of law-SLP of Revenue is dismissed as the delay of 213 days is not satisfactorily explained. [S. 68, 143(1), 148, 260A, 292B, Art. 136]

CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 102 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd (2023) 153 taxmann.com 641 (Delhi)(HC)