S.57: Income from other sources — Deductions —Interest payment for earning of income – Held to be deductible . [ S.56 ]
Best Trading and Agencies Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 428 ITR 52 (Karn)(HC)S.57: Income from other sources — Deductions —Interest payment for earning of income – Held to be deductible . [ S.56 ]
Best Trading and Agencies Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 428 ITR 52 (Karn)(HC)S.54F : Capital gains- Investment in a residential house Sale of capital asset and construction or purchase of residential house within stipulated time —Purchase or construction need not be made out of sale consideration for capital asset . [ S.45, 54(1) ]
Moturi Lakshmi ( Ms.) v. ITO (2020) 428 ITR 462/194 DTR 417/ 274 Taxman 286 (Mad) (HC)S. 50B : Capital gains – Slump sale – Assets transferred to Subsidiary- Allotment of Shares — Scheme approved by High Court — Not slump sale for purposes of capital gains Tax — The transfer, pursuant to approval of a scheme of arrangement, was not a contractual transfer, but a statutorily approved transfer and could not be brought within the definition of the word sale -Claim which was not raised in return or revised return – Appellate authorities must consider the claim if facts are on record – No estoppel in taxation law – [ S.2(42C) 45 , 54EC , Companies Act , S. 393, 394, Transfer of property Act, 1882 S.118 , Sale of Goods Act , 1930 , S.2(10) ]
Areva T & D India Ltd. v. CIT (2020) 428 ITR 1/ 195 DTR 361/ 317 CTR 633 (Mad)(HC)S.45 : Capital gains —Block of assets – Land and building —Valued separately — Held to be justified [ S. 2(11) ]
PCIT v. Gunnebo India Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 233 (Bom)(HC)S. 43D : Public financial institutions – Co-Operative Bank -Real income — Interest on non-performing assets cannot be taxed on accrual basis- Amendment should apply to pending matters [ S.80P(4) 145 ]
PCIT v. Solapur District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd ( 2019) 261 Taxman 476 /(2020) 428 ITR 306 (Bom)(HC) PCIT v. Laxmi Co-Operative Bank Ltd. ( 2019) 261 Taxman 476 / (2020) 428 ITR 306 (Bom)(HC)S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction -Exporter of cotton entering into forward contracts — Loss incurred is not a loss in speculative transaction —Entitled to deduction of loss [ S.28 (i ) ]
CIT v. Celebrity Fashion Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 470 (Mad) (HC)S. 40A(3) :Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits -Banking facilities available — No Evidence of compelling circumstances justifying payments — Disallowance justified. [ R.6DD ]
Vaduganathan Talkies v. ITO (2020) 428 ITR 224 / 275 Taxman 599(Mad) (HC)S. 40A(2): Expenses or payments not deductible – Excessive or unreasonable – No reasonable cause shown – Disallowance is held to be justified .
Nam Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 428 ITR 186/(2021 ) 277 Taxman 169 (Karn)(HC)S.37(1 ) : Business expenditure — Service charges paid to employees in terms of agreement entered into under Industrial Disputes Act — Held to be allowable .[ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, S 18(1) ]
New Woodlands Hotel Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 428 ITR 492/ 274 Taxman 468/196 DTR 449 (Mad) (HC)S.37(1):Business expenditure — Capital or revenue- Fluctuation in foreign exchange rates – Loan to purchase plant and machinery — Increase in liability – Capital expenditure.
Continuum Wind Energe (India) Pvt. Ltd. v .Dy. CIT (2020) 428 ITR 559 (Mad) (HC)