S. 153A: Assessment – Search – Addition can not be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the search. [ S. 69A , 69C, 132 ]
Dy.CIT v. Aba Builders Ltd. (2025) 233 TTJ 328 (Delhi) ( Trib)S. 153A: Assessment – Search – Addition can not be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the search. [ S. 69A , 69C, 132 ]
Dy.CIT v. Aba Builders Ltd. (2025) 233 TTJ 328 (Delhi) ( Trib)S. 153A: Assessment – Search – No addition can be made merely on the basis of statement -On money – Presumption- Addition is deleted .[ S. 132, 153C, 292C ]
Kalyan Development Corporation v. ACIT (2025) 233 TTJ 413 (Mum) ( Trib)S. 153A: Assessment – Search – Revenue followed detailed guidelines during the search – Approval under the section cannot be considered as granted mechanically- Matter is restored to CIT(A) . [ S. 153D ]
Neelu Sanjay Gupta (Smt. ) Legal Heir of Late Sanjay Gupta v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 29 (Ahd) ( Trib)S. 151 : Reassessment – Sanction for issue of notice –
– Notice u/s 148 issued beyond 3-year period – As per amended Section 151 (post 01.04.2021), approval from PCCIT/CCIT was required, but approval was taken from PCIT – Reassessment proceedings quashed. [ S. 147 , 148 ]
S. 151 : Reassessment – Sanction for issue of notice –Approval is granted in mechanical manner – Reassessment is quashed
Communication of assessment order – Assessment orders and demand notices issued u/s. 156, without a Document Identification Number (DIN) are unsustainable in law and can be considered invalid. [ S. 119 , 147 148 , 156 ]
S. 147 : Reassessment – CIT(A) partly allowed the claim against losses – reopening of assessment on same issue – CIT(A) allowed the reopening – Held, reopening not valid as no fresh material on record. [ S. 148 ]
Madras Race Club v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 383 (Chennai) ( Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment – Best judgment assessment – Unexplained money -Entire cash deposit cannot be treated as income – Income of the assessee is estimated at 10 per cent of cash credit and other credit . [ S.69A 148 , 249(3) ]
Kailashnath Arunkumar Dube v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 720 (SMC) (Surat) ( Trib )S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Assessee did not file ITR – Assessment reopened u/s 147 – Capital gain not declared –limitation – Assessment order barred by limitation as extended time limit u/s 153 not applicable. [ S. 2(14)(iii) , 144C(13), 147 , 148 , 153 (2), 153(4) ]
Mir Ibrahim Ali v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 233 TTJ 733 (Hyd) ( Trib)S. 92B : Transfer pricing – International transaction – Arm’s length price -Avoidance of tax – Transactions between head office (HO) and Project Office (PO) in India- Transactions between a foreign enterprise and its PE in India qualify as international transactions under section 92B, even if both are non-residents subject to ALP adjustment – The matter is directed to be placed before the Division Bench to give effect to the direction – DTAA -India -China. [S.92 Art. 7(2),9 ]
TBEA Shenyang Transformer Group Company Ltd. v. Dy. CIT(IT) (2025) 210 ITD 53 (SB) (Ahd.)( (Trib.)S. 90 :Double taxation relief – Mauritius company – Indian company shares acquired before 01-04-2017- Sale claimed as exempt using Article 13(4) of the DTAA – No capital gains as TRC was given and grandfathering of treaty.- DTAA -India – Mauritius [S.90, Art. 13(4) ]
Norwest Venture Partners X-Mauritius v. DCIT /[2024] 160 taxmann.com 632 /[2025] 121 ITR 239(Delhi)( Trib)