This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 205 : Deduction at source-Bar against direct demand-Tax deduction at source on salary-Employer failed to deposit the amount of TDS from salary to the Central Government-Discrepancy reflected in Form 26AS-The department should not deny the benefit of TDS by employer simply on mismatch in 26AS arising out of non deposit of TDS amount to the Central Government-Any recovery or adjustment made by the Department in interregnum is to be refunded to the assessee with statutory interest. [S.191, 192, 234A, 234B, 234C, Art. 226]

Malay Kar v. UOI (2024) 162 taxmann.com 767/ 472 ITR 714 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source-Contractors-Project work on ‘Build-Own-Operate-Transfer”-Subsidy-Infusion of equity capital as measure of financial support through contractual obligation cannot be treated as payment for work undertaken-Provisions of section is 194C not applicable.[S. 260A]

CIT (TDS) v. National Highway Authority of India (2025) 472 ITR 486 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 179: Private company-Liability of directors-Order passed upon deceased assessee-director raising tax demand of Company-Company was under CIRP under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)-No efforts by AO in compliance to Section 179(1)-Proceedings commenced upon the assessee-director quashed and set aside.(Art. 226]

Manjula D. Rita v. Pr.CIT (2023) 153 taxmann.com 468/ 472 ITR 116 (Bom)(HC) Bhavya D.Rita v. Pr.CIT (2023) 153 taxmann.com 468/ 472 ITR 116 (Bom)(HC)

S. 158BD : Block assessment-Undisclosed income of any other person-No satisfaction note from the Assessing Officer of the searched person-Initiation is without jurisdiction-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S. 260A]

PCIT v. Milia Tracon Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 473 ITR 155 (Cal.) (HC)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Since rectification order was passed three years after framing of original order of assessment,-Pendency of appeal-Rectification order is quashed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]

International Hospital Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 167 taxmann.com 317 /(2025) 472 ITR 400 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Additions based on a survey conducted in premises of assessee and not based on incriminating material found/seized during search and neither recorded in ‘Satisfaction Note’ during assessment under S. 153C cannot be sustained and deserves to be deleted.[S. 133A, 260A]

PCIT Central v TDI Infrastructure Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 540 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Material related to assessee being other person found during search and handed over to AO-Assessment ought to have been made under S. 153C and not S. 143(3) of the Act-Order of Tribunal quashing the addition is affirmed. [S. 143(3), 260A]

PCIT v. Tarun Devcon Pvt. Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 444 (MP(HC).

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-No incriminating material is found-The Assessing Officer (AO) can only reopen assessments for the block period of six years if incriminating material related to each specific year is found during the search and not otherwise-Order of Tribunal is set aside. [S. 132, 158BB, 260A]

Sunny Jacob Jewellers Gold Hyper Market v. CIT (2025) 473 ITR 159 (Ker.) (HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Additions unsustainable in the absence of incriminating material for unabated assessments-No addition can be made-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 132, 133A, 153C, 260A]

PCIT v. Shri Satya Prakash Gupta (2024) 473 ITR 515 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-When there is no finding or direction in terms of clause (i) of sub-section (6) of Section 153, the extended time shall be 60 days, as specified in the first proviso to Explanation 1 of Section 153, rather than 12 months-Direction-Inconsequence of-To give effect to-Finding-Assessment order is barred by limitation. [S. 143(3) 144B, 147, 148, 153(3)(ii), 153(6), 260,Income Tax Act, 1922, S. 34(3), Art. 226]

Wavy Construction LLP v. ACIT (2025) 473 ITR 1 (Bom.) (HC)