This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Additional evidence of lorry expenses for first time before CIT(A)-Considering the remand report Tribunal confirmed the addition-Miscellaneous application was dismissed-High court remanded the matter to AO for readjudication. [S. 254(2), 260A]
Dilip Kumar v. ACIT (2020) 269 Taxman 93 / 196 DTR 199(Mad.)(HC)
S. 28(i) : Business loss-Business expenditure-Obsolescence allowance-Write of off obsolete stock-Allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1), 145A]
CIT v. Gigabyte Technology (India) Ltd. (2020) 421 ITR 21/ 195 DTR 334 / 273 Taxman 184(Bom.)(HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income- Disallowance cannot exceed assessee’s exempt income. [R. 8D]
Nirved Traders Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 421 ITR 142 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Disallowance cannot exceed exempt income earned-Tribunal restricting disallowance to extent offered by assessee is held to be proper. [R. 8D]
CIT v. HSBC Invest Direct (India) Ltd. (2020) 421 ITR 125 (Bom.) (HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No non-taxable income in relevant assessment Year-No disallowance can be made.
CIT v. Apollo Infrastructure Projects Finance Co. Ltd. (2020) 421 ITR 162 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Manufacture-Conversion of copper clad glass epoxy laminate into smaller pieces-Processes amounted to manufacture-Entitled to exemption.
CIT v. Fine Line Circuits Co. (2020) 421 ITR 225/ 189 DTR 301/ 317 CTR 929 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Total turnover-Foreign currency expenditure incurred for providing software development services outside India cannot be excluded from export turnover for purpose of computing deduction-When expenditure incurred in foreign currency on account of telecommunication expenses is excluded from export turnover, said expenditure has to be excluded from total turnover also for purpose of computation of deduction. [S. 80HHC, 80HHE ]
CIT v. Mphasis Ltd. (2016) 74 taxmann.com 274 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed; CIT v. Mphasis Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 3 (SC)
S. 10(24) : Association of trade unions-Amount received on settlement of dispute between company and its workers-Amount disbursed to workers-Amount not assessable in hands of trade union.
Gujarat Rajya Kamdar Sabha Union Machiwadi v. ITO (2020) 421 ITR 341/312 CTR 313 / 185 DTR 336(Guj.)(HC)