S.28(i): Business loss — Fluctuation in foreign exchange rate was held to be allowable. [ S.37(i) ]
PCIT v. Samwon Precision Mould Mfg. India Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 401 ITR 486 (Delhi) (HC)S.28(i): Business loss — Fluctuation in foreign exchange rate was held to be allowable. [ S.37(i) ]
PCIT v. Samwon Precision Mould Mfg. India Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 401 ITR 486 (Delhi) (HC)S. 28(i): Business income – Penny stock – Donation- Assessable as business income and not as short-term capital gains, deduction of donation was held to be allowable . [ S. 35,45 ]
Prem Jain (Smt) v. ITO ( 2018) 63 ITR 52 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib) , www.itatonline.orgS. 28(i) : Business income – Income from house property- License fee to operate hotel for a specified period was held to be assessable as inform from business and not as income from house property [ S. 22 ]
Palmshore Hotels (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (A)( 2018) 252 Taxman 191 (Ker.)(HC) Editorial: Order in Palmshore Hotels (P.) Ltd. v. CIT ( 2012) 28 taxmann.com 156 ( Cochin) (Trib) is reversedS. 28(i): Business income – Capital gains- Adventure in the nature of trade – Assessable as business income [ S. 2(13), 45 , Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition & Transfer of Immovable Property in India, Regulation 2000) S. 47 ]
V. A. Jose v. Dy. CIT (2018) 252 Taxman 386 (Ker.)(HC)S. 23 : Income from house property – Annual value – Municipal valuation can be a pointer for fetching reasonable rental value, however multiplication factor derived for another property located in different locality, though in same city, cannot be applied blindly.[ S. 22,24 ]
ACIT v. Kamini Sundararam. (Smt.) (2018) 168 ITD 513 (Chennai) (Trib.)S. 22 : Income from house property – Rental income is held to be assessable as income from house property though the land is not owned by the assesse. [ S. 24, 27(iiib), 56 ]
JG Exports v. ITO (2018) 168 ITD 21 (Chennai) (Trib.)S. 17 : Perquisite – Amount received by an employee from redemption of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) can not be assessed as “perquisite” or as “profits of business” [ S.17(2)(iii), 28(iv), 45 ]
ACIT v. Bharat V. Patel (2018) 165 DTR 218 (SC) , www.itatonline.orgS. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – When there is no exempt income disallowance cannot be made .[ R.8D ]
ACIT v. Claridges Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (20180 61 ITR 135 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income –PSU bonds of NTPC – Disallowance was restricted to 1 percent of exempt income [ R.8D ]
DCIT v. Growmore Leasing & Investment Ltd. (2018) 168 ITD 1 (Mum) (Trib.)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income -No disallowance can be made for securities held as stock in trade- Interest free funds available with assessee , no disallowance can be made [ R.8D, 36(1)(iii) ]
Siddhesh Capital Market Services P. Ltd. v. (2018) 61 ITR 400 //53 CCH 427(Mum) (Trib)