S.36(1)(vii) : Bad debts– Provision for bad and doubtful debts which was not written off cannot be allowable as deduction .
Shalom Charitable Ministries of India v. ACIT (2018) 171 ITD 338/ 195 TTJ 340/( 2019) 177 DTR 22 (Cochin)(Trib.)S.36(1)(vii) : Bad debts– Provision for bad and doubtful debts which was not written off cannot be allowable as deduction .
Shalom Charitable Ministries of India v. ACIT (2018) 171 ITD 338/ 195 TTJ 340/( 2019) 177 DTR 22 (Cochin)(Trib.)S. 36(1)(va) : Any sum received from employees – Employees contribution to PF and ESI was allowable deduction to the assessee if deposited before due date of filing of return u/s 139(1) of the Act. [ S.139(1) ]
Powerware India P. Ltd. v. ITO ( 2018) 61 ITR 746 (Cuttack) ( Trib)S. 36(1)(v); Contribution approved gratuity fund -Payment to a gratuity fund on a date prior to date of approval of a gratuity fund- Deduction cannot be denied .
Prakash Software Solution (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 161 DTR 9 / 191 TTJ 64(Ahd.) (Trib)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital – Capital was borrowed for acquisition of fixed assets and only a part of assets were put to use- Interest was to be allowed only to the extent the assets were operational during the current year.
ACIT v. Pasadensa Foods Ltd. (2018) 163 DTR 243 (Delhi)( Trib.)S. 36(1)(iii):Interest on borrowed capital-Finance Charges- Not deductible as these expenses were not relatable to the main business activity of the assessee. [S. 57(iii)]
Asia Investments Pvt Ltd v. ACIT (2018) 63 ITR 535 / 193 TTJ 214 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 36(1)(ii) : Interest on borrowed capital- Utilized for purchase of shares- Allowable as deduction.
Abhinand Investment Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 192 TTJ 51 (UO) (Kol.) (Trib.)S.28(i): Business income- Agricultural income – Where the agricultural activities were carried out by the farmers mere supervision by the Assessee without carrying basic operation would not qualify as agricultural activities and accordingly income of the Assessee from processing, packing and sale of various seeds procured from farmers was liable to be treated as business income and not agricultural income [ S.10(1) ]
P.H.I. Seeds Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT ( 2018) 165 DTR 129 /192 TTJ 412(Delhi)( Trib)S. 35D : Amortization of preliminary expenses – Fees paid for increasing the authorize share capital of the assessee company which has been registered in an earlier year is not allowable as a preliminary expense [S. 40(a)(ia) , 194J]
Campbell Shipping (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 192 TTJ 24 (Mum.)(UO)(Trib.)S. 32 : Depreciation- Computer peripherals-Eligible higher rate of depreciation .
CEVA Freight India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 192 TTJ 887/ 172 DTR 55 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 32 : Depreciation- Non compete fee- Depreciation is held to be not allowable .
Dy. CIT v. Excelax Bio Polymers (P) Ltd. (2018) 192 TTJ 49 (UO)(Delhi)(Trib.)