S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital – Advance to director for the purpose of business- Disallowance of interest cannot be made .
CIT v. Mira Exim Ltd. (2018) 400 ITR 28 (Delhi) (HC)S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital – Advance to director for the purpose of business- Disallowance of interest cannot be made .
CIT v. Mira Exim Ltd. (2018) 400 ITR 28 (Delhi) (HC)S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital – Borrowings for expansion of business, interest was held to be allowable as deduction-Amendment to S.36,with effect From 1-4-2004 is prospective and not retrospective.[ S. 37(1) ]
CIT v. Modern Threads (I) Ltd. (2018) 400 ITR 381 (Raj) (HC) CIT v. Modern Syntex (2018) 400 ITR 381 (Raj) (HC)S. 36(1)(iii):Interest on borrowed capital — Interest free advances out of surplus funds hence interest was held to be allowable .
PCIT v.Sahjanand Laser Technology Ltd. (2018) 401 ITR 478 (Guj) (HC)S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital – Advance to subsidiaries- Presumption is that the advance was from the interest free generated or available with the company- Disallowance of interest was held to be not valid .
CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd ( 2018) 161 DTR 420/ ( 2019) 410 ITR 468 ( Bom) (HC)Editorial: Affirmed, CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd ( 2019) 410 ITR 466 /175 DTR 1/ 307 CTR 121 (SC)S.36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital -Firm- Exempt income -Capital assets received in form of shares in names of partners and not firm — Failure to establish shares forming part of capital account of firm —Disallowance was held to be justified [ S. 14A , 263 ]
Shiva Auto Mobiles (Auto Division) v. CIT (2018) 402 ITR 427 (All) (HC)S. 35E :Expenditure on prospecting – Minerals –Amortisation- 10% of expenses was held to be allowable .
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 61 ITR 585 (Ctk) (Trib)S. 35D : Amortisation of preliminary expenses – No disallowances can be made as there was no material to show that the business income of shipping division was offered on basis of tonnage tax scheme [ S. 37(1) ]
ACIT v. Chambal Fertilisers And Chemicals Limited. (2018) 61 ITR 33 (Jaipur) (Trib)S. 35 : Scientific research – Approval of competent authority is mandatory to claim weighted deduction [ S. 35(2AB)]
PCP Chemicals (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 168 ITD 26 (Mum) (Trib.)S. 32: Depreciation — Gym equipment installed in premises of assessee’s Managing Director was held to be allowable .[ S. 2(11) ]
ACIT v. Claridges Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (20180 61 ITR 135 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 32: Depreciation — Depreciation cannot be disallowed on motor car only on the reason that cars were parked on promoter’s premises .
ACIT v. Claridges Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (20180 61 ITR 135 (Delhi) (Trib)