This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 28(i) : Business income-Income from house property-Service centre operations-Commercial exploitation with various amenities-Assessable as business income.[S. 22]

Dy. CIT v. Piramal Estates (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 488 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 24 : Income from house property-Deductions-Interest on borrowed capital-Building partly let out and partly used for business-Apportionment of interest on area basis-Deduction allowable.[S. 22]

Dy. CIT v. Piramal Estates (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 488 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income earned-Disallowance not sustainable. [R. 8D]

SIEL Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (LTU) (2025) 123 ITR 599 / 173 taxmann.com 278 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income earned-No disallowance permissible. [R. 8D]

Dy. CIT v. Piramal Estates (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 488 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Charitable purpose-Advancement of object of general public utility-Business-Microfinance activities carried on with predominant profit motive-Exemption denied.[S. 2(15), 12, 12AA]

Innovative Microfinance for Poverty Alleviation and Community Transformation v. Dy. CIT (E) (2025) 123 ITR 188 / 174 taxmann.com 502 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Non-resident-Domain name registration services-Registrar not owner of domain names-Receipts not taxable as royalty-Web hosting and allied services-Independent services-Not Fees for Technical Services-“Make available” test-Web hosting and related services-No transfer of technical knowledge-Not Fees for Included Services. DTAA-India-USA.[S.9(1)(vii),Art. 12(3), 12(4)(a), 12(4)(b)]

GoDaddy.com, LLC v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 123 ITR 29 / 170 taxmann.com 408 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S.271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit –Alleged cash receipt neither loan nor deposit-Quantum addition deleted-Penalty not leviable.[S. 269SS]

Subhash Chander Gupta v. ITO (2025) 124 ITR 247 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Best judgment assessment under section 144-Estimation of income at 2 per cent. of the bank credits-Different opinion of Principal Commissioner not sufficient-Revision invalid-Best judgment assessment-Statutory discretion of Assessing Officer-Cannot be interfered with merely on difference of opinion.[S. 142(1), 144]

Sanjay Umarshi Dand v. Pr. CIT (2025) 124 ITR 399 (Nagpur)(Trib.)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limitation-Issue arising from intimation under section 143(1) and not reassessment under section 147-Limitation to be reckoned from date of intimation-Revision barred by limitation-Delay of 96 days-Person responsible for filing appeal on leave due to daughter’s marriage-Sufficient cause-Delay condoned.
[S. 143(1), 147, 148, 254(1)]

Shiv Vegpro (P.) Ltd. v. Pr. CIT (2025) 124 ITR 64 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 201: Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Assessee in default-Notice issued beyond four years-Proceedings barred by limitation-Delay of 218 days-Delay due to illness of authorised representative-Sufficient cause-Delay condoned.[S. 133A(2A), 201(1), 201(IA) 254(1)]

Indoworth India Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 124 ITR 573 / 176 taxmann.com 426 (Nagpur)(Trib.)