This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account-Estimation of profits at 3 Per Cent by the Assessing Officer is affirmed. [S.44AA, 145(3)]

ITO v. BASE Industries Ltd. (2024)112 ITR 56 (SN)(Surat)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment-Eligible assessee-Resident Of Thailand Holding Residency Certificate-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to pass speaking order duly following directions of Dispute Resolution Panel.[S. 143(3)]

Veeratham Sachdev v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024)112 ITR 79 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Transfer Pricing Officer to pass order at any time before 60 days prior to limitation-Order is barred by limitation. [S. 92CA(3A), 153]

Diageo India P. Ltd. v. ITO (2024)112 ITR 435 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-International Transactions-Transfer Pricing-Limitation-Assessment not completed within 21 months from end of Assessment Year plus extension of 12 months for transfer pricing reference-Assessment is barred by limitation-Order is invalid-Draft Assessment order-Eligible assessee-Order is quashed. [S.92CA, 114(15)(b)(ii), 153]

India Medtronic P. Ltd. v. ITO (2024)112 ITR 447 /229 TTJ 257/239 DTR 15 (Mum)(Trib)

S.143(3): Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-Scrap-Methodology in determination of average sale of scrap per day and making addition is against established trade practices-Deletion of addition is affirmed. [S.69]

ACIT v. NRB Bearings Ltd. (2024)112 ITR 17 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-Cash deposits in Account-Land aggregator-Failure to response to notice by the builder-Addition is affirmed.[S.44AD]

Amit Kumar Bhati v. ITO (2024)112 ITR 34 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Selection of comparables-Companies whose segmental data not available, having functional disparity with assessee, undergoing extraordinary event of amalgamation are to be excluded from list of comparables-Profit level indicator-Service tax refund or service tax written back is operating revenue.[S. 144C(13)]

Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)112 ITR 21 (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-A Group Concern of foreign company, Business process outsourcing and knowledge process outsourcing-Comparables-Functional dissimilarity and absence of segmental data-Turnover of company more than 14 times to be excluded from list of comparables.-Ad hoc two per cent. for working capital adjustment-Remanded to transfer pricing officer to adopt reasonable percentage on actual basis based on data available on record.[S.92CA]

Crisil Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2024)112 ITR 56 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-A Group Concern of foreign company, Business process outsourcing and knowledge process outsourcing-Comparables-Functional dissimilarity and absence of segmental data-Turnover of company more than 14 times to be excluded from list of comparables.-Ad hoc two per cent. for working capital adjustment-Remanded to transfer pricing officer to adopt reasonable percentage on actual basis based on data available on record.

Crisil Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2024)112 ITR 56 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Commission on standby letter of credit-No cost is incurred-Adjustment is deleted.

Bhartiya International Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 112 ITR 207/227 TTJ 897 (Delhi)(Trib)