This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Since rectification order was passed three years after framing of original order of assessment,-Pendency of appeal-Rectification order is quashed. [S. 147, 148,292B, Art. 226]

International Hospital Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 167 taxmann.com 317 /(2025) 472 ITR 400 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Additions based on a survey conducted in premises of assessee and not based on incriminating material found/seized during search and neither recorded in ‘Satisfaction Note’ during assessment under S. 153C cannot be sustained and deserves to be deleted.[S. 133A, 260A]

PCIT Central v. TDI Infrastructure Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 540 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Material related to assessee being other person found during search and handed over to AO-Assessment ought to have been made under S. 153C and not S. 143(3) of the Act-Order of Tribunal quashing the addition is affirmed. [S. 143(3), 260A]

PCIT v. Tarun Devcon Pvt. Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 444 (MP(HC).

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-No incriminating material is found-The Assessing Officer (AO) can only reopen assessments for the block period of six years if incriminating material related to each specific year is found during the search and not otherwise-Order of Tribunal is set aside. [S. 132, 158BB, 260A]

Sunny Jacob Jewellers Gold Hyper Market v. CIT (2025) 473 ITR 159 (Ker.) (HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Additions unsustainable in the absence of incriminating material for unabated assessments-No addition can be made-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 132, 133A, 153C, 260A]

PCIT v. Shri Satya Prakash Gupta ( 2024) 164 Taxmann.com 137 /(2025) 473 ITR 515 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-When there is no finding or direction in terms of clause (i) of sub-section (6) of Section 153, the extended time shall be 60 days, as specified in the first proviso to Explanation 1 of Section 153, rather than 12 months-Direction-Inconsequence of-To give effect to-Finding-Assessment order is barred by limitation. [S. 143(3) 144B, 147, 148, 153(3)(ii), 153(6), 260,Income Tax Act, 1922, S. 34(3), Art. 226]

Wavy Construction LLP v. ACIT (2025) 473 ITR 1 /170 taxmann.com 174(Bom.) (HC)

S.151A : Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment-Notices under section 148 must be issued in a faceless manner through automated allocation as per section 151A and the notification dated 29-3-2022. The Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) lacks the authority to issue such notices, rendering them illegal and invalid. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd. v. DCIT(2024) 300 Taxman 190 / (2025) 473 ITR 148 (Bom.) (HC)

S.151A : Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment-Reassessment-Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of Faceless Officer held to be without jurisdiction [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Sprite Investment (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 300 Taxman 526 / 473 ITR 342 (Bom)(HC)

S. 150: Assessment-Order on appeal-Conditions set out in S. 150 are required to be fulfilled for invoking S. 150 for issuance of notice under S. 148 beyond the period stipulated under S. 149-Appeal of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 148, 149, 254(1), 260A]

PCIT Central v. Capital Power Systems Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 481 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 149 : Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Provisions of relevant assessment year applicable for reassessment proceedings. [S. 147 148,149(1)(b), Art. 226]

Bhoomi Viral Shah v. ITO (2024) 473 ITR 574 (Bom.) (HC) Editorial: This decision is prior to the Apex Court’s judgment of UOI v. Rajeev Bansal (2024)469 ITR 46/ 301 ITR 238 (SC)