This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Incorrect premise-Reassessment notice based on incorrect assumption of non-filing of return-Held to be invalid-Order cannot be justified on basis of reasons supplied subsequently-DTAA-India-Mauritius [S. 9, 147,148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 13(4), Art. 226]
Banyan Real Estate Fund Mauritius v. ACIT (IT) (2024) 165 taxmann.com 210 /(2025) 473 ITR 466 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-No opportunity of being heard-Violation of principles of natural justice-Reassessment notice u/s 148 and order u/s 148A(d) quashed [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1)(a), 149(1)(b)]
Nalinaksha Sarma v. UOI (2025) 473 ITR 257 (Gauhati) (HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-The interest income received from Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) was appropriately taxed under section 194LD, and could not be characterized as dividend liable for Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under section 115-O-Nexus between material relied on and formation of belief is necessary-Recorded reasons cannot be substituted-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S.115O, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 194LD, Art. 226]
Genpact Luxembourg S. A. R. L. v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 473 ITR 68 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order is passed without giving assessee adequate opportunity to reply to the initial notice-Order is not valid-Matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Ahmedabad District Co-op Milk Producers Union Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 472 ITR 214 (Guj.) (HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Petitioner had explicitly sought for a personal hearing-Not granted-Breach of the principles of natural justice-Order is set aside.[S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Pico Capital Private Limited v. Dy. CIT (2025) 170 taxmann.com 638 (Bom)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Merger-Non Existing entity-Notice issued to a non-existing entity post-merger was a substantive illegality and not some procedural violation-Notice and order is quashed and set aside. [S.147, 292B, Art. 226]
City Corporation Limited v. ACIT (2025) 171 taxmann.com 301 (Bom) (HC)
S. 148 : Re-assessment-Notice-Notice issued in the name of amalgamating company instead of amalgamated company-Not a curable defect-Notice is invalid. [S.260A, 292B].
PCIT v. GPT Sons Pvt. Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 234 (Cal)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Failure to intimate the amalgamation-Petition is dismissed. [S. 147, 292B, Art. 226]
International Hospital Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 167 taxmann.com 317 /(2025) 472 ITR 400 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Informed the factum of amalgamation-Reassessment in the name of non-existent amalgamating entity a nullity-Not curable defect cannot be validated under section 292B-Notice and consequential order is quashed. [S. 147, 292B, Art. 226]
International Hospital Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 167 taxmann.com 317 /(2025) 472 ITR 400 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Ex parte assessment-First information report allegations filed by daughter against her husband and in laws-Physical inability to participate in proceedings-Ex parte assessment order and demand notice is quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Mohinder Singh v. ITO (2025) 473 ITR 354 (P& H)(HC)