This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Clerical omission, deduction was claimed under section 10(23C)(iiiad) instead of the correct section 10(23C)(vi)-Order of Assessing Officer rejecting the request for rectification was set aside. [S. 10(23C)(iiiad), 10(23C)(vi), 11,12, 12AA Form No.10B]

Om Charitable Chikitsa Samiti v. Assessing Officer (E) (2025) 214 ITD 633 (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Delay in filing application-No mala fide conduct or gross negligence-Delay was condoned-Matter was remanded to the file of CIT (E). [S.10(23C)(5)]

Chetana. v. CIT (E) (2025) 214 ITD 91 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vii):Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Income from providing centralized group services such as communication, marketing, strategy, HR, treasury, finance-Taxable in India as fees for technical services-Guarantee fee from its Indian subsidiaries for providing corporate and performance guarantees, since providing guarantees was not a regular business activity but an obligation arising from parent–subsidiary relationship, such fee was taxable in India as other income-DTAA-India-Finland.[Art. 7, 12, 21]

Metso OYJ. v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 214 ITD 533 (Kol) (Trib.)

S. 4: Charge of income-tax-Subsidy-Industrial Promotional Subsidy from State Government-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) for adjudication afresh.[S. 2(24)(viii)]

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 214 ITD 193 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 4: Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue-Subsidy-Income received on sale of Market Linked Focus Product Scheme (MLFPS) scrips was a capital receipt.[S. 2(24)(xviii) 28(i)]

DCIT v. Armstrong Knitting Mills. (2025) 214 ITD 219 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e): Deemed dividend-Advance salary to director-Disallowance cannot be made.

Patidar Builder (P.) Ltd. v. Assessing Officer (2025) 214 ITD 77 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 2(14)(iii) : Capital asset-Agricultural land-Capital gains-Failed to prove that distance from municipal limits exceeded 8 kms,-land constituted capital asset under section 2(14) and liable to capital gains tax.[S. 2(14),2(14)(iii)(b), 45]

Natesan Ekambaram. v. DCIT (2025) 214 ITD 615 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 115BBE: Taxation of unexplained income – Amendment enhancing tax rate from 30% to 60% w.e.f. 01.04.2017 cannot be applied retrospectively to income of F.Y. 2016-17 – Law applicable on the first day of the assessment year governs assessment – Enhanced tax and consequential penalty provisions are prospective- Demonetisation- Cash deposited in Bank -Charge of tax- The enhanced rate of tax @60% came into force on 01.04.2017 and can apply only from that date, i.e. for financial year 2017-18 onwards. [S.4, 68, 69 to 69D, 271AAC, Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016, Art. 226)]

Deepak Maratha v. UOI (Raj.)(HC) [2026:RJ-JD:26319-DB]. www.itatonline.org .

S.254(1): Appellate Tribunal – Powers – Condonation of Delay – Co-operative society – Appeal filed after 13 years – Delay caused due to bona fide belief that rectification would be carried out by the Department, change in managing committee, dependence on accountant and Covid-related disruptions – Delay condoned and matter restored for adjudication on merits.[ S. 80P(2)(d), 143(1), 249(3)]

Bakhtawar Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. v. ITO ( Mum) Trib) www.itatonline.org .

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Failure to specify the charge-Levy of penalty was deleted. [S. 274]

Delhi Building & others Construction Workers Welfare Trust Board v. Dy. DIT(E) (2025) 213 ITD 704 (Delhi) (Trib.)