This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Conditions-Maintainability-Condition in CBDT order requiring eligibility to file application as on 31.01.2021 held invalid-Application filed after said date but before cut-off date is maintainable even if no proceeding was pending on 31.01.2021-Interim Board for Settlement could not have rejected assessee’s application and, thus, impugned order passed by it was to be set aside. [S. 119,133A, 148, 245D, Art. 226]

Swadik Trade (P) Ltd v. CBDT [2024] 165 taxmann.com 847 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Conditions-Application-Retrospective bar on filing w.e.f. 01.02.2021 by Finance Act, 2021-Validity of application filed before Act’s notification-Vested Right-CBDT notification imposing eligibility condition as on 31.01.2021-Invalid. [S. 119, 153A, 245C(5), Art. 226]

Sar Senapati Santaji Ghorpade Sugar Factory Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 166 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 245AA : Interim Boards for Settlement-Scope of total income-Accrual of income-Interest on Government securities-Mercantile system-Right to receive interest on Government securities vests only on due date stipulated therein and not on a day‑to‑day basis-Order of Settlement Commission set aside for being contrary to law and for violation of principles of natural justice-Matter remanded to the Interim Boards for Settlement. [S. 5145,245AA 245C, 245D, Art. 226]

Indusind Bank Ltd v. ITSC [2024] 169 taxmann.com 588 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 245 : Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Prior intimation is a mandatory pre-condition-Adjustment made without such intimation is illegal. [S. 220(6), Art. 226]

Avana Global FZCO v. DCIT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 452 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Delay due to technical glitches-Where refund determined by AO was not processed by CPC due to technical glitches, Court directed CPC to issue refund by a specified date, failing which a physical cheque with interest under section 244A was to be issued. [Art. 226]

Macrotech Developers Ltd v. PCIT [2024] 160 taxmann.com 254 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016-Moratorium-Adjustment of refund against past demands barred-TDS collected before moratorium not refundable. [S. 199, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016,9, 14, Art. 226]

PCIT-6 v. National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai [2024] 168 taxmann.com 700 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 158AB : Repetitive appeals-Identical question of law-An application to defer filing of an appeal was allowed where an identical question for a previous year was pending and the assessee had consented. [S. 158A(b),260A, Income-tax Rules, 1962, R.16]

ACIT v. Sandvik IT Services Ab [2024] (Bom.)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016-Resolution Plan-Extinguishment of dues-Once a resolution plan is approved by the NCLT, all claims not part of the plan, including statutory dues for the pre-CIRP period, stand extinguished-The Revenue cannot initiate or continue proceedings for such a period post-approval. [S.. 132,. 133, 142(1), 143(2), 143(3) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, 31]

Uttam Value Steels Ltd v. ACIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 493 / [2024] 186 SCL 70 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 151A : Face less assessment scheme-Reassessment-Jurisdiction-Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO)-Vitiated for want of jurisdiction. [S.148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

HDFC Ergo General Insurance Ltd v. ACIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 357 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 151A : Face less assessment scheme-Reassessment-Jurisdiction-Notices under sections 148 and 148A issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO)-Held to be without jurisdiction and invalid. [S.148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Eureka Forbes Ltd v. DCIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 222 (Bom.)(HC)