This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Search and Seizure-Issue given up on appeal to Tribunal-Issue cannot be raised before High court. [S. 143(3), 153A,153C]

Dattaprasad Kamat v. ACIT (2023) 458 ITR 201 / 153 taxmann.com 702/ 335 CTR 609 (Bom)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 498 days-Cyclostyled application-Not sufficient cause-Delay was not condoned. [Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S. 151]

PCIT v. National Fertilizers Ltd. (2023)458 ITR 20 /154 taxmann.com 426/ 334 CTR 305 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Appeals by Revenue and Assessee-Tribunal should consider both appeals together. [S.253, 260A]

Linklaters v. Dy. DIT (IT) (2023)458 ITR 110 /147 taxmann.com 128 (Bom)(HC)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Finding of CIT(A) on remand for fresh assessment after further enquiry which was up held by the Tribunal is quashed.[S. 251(1)(a), 254(1),260A]

Arun Kumar Bose v. ITO (2023)458 ITR 32/ 158 taxmann.com 282 (Cal)(HC) Editorial : Order of Tribunal in Arun Kumar Bose v. ITO(2023) 107 ITR 263 (Kol)(Trib) is reversed.

S. 245 : Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Failure to comply with provision-Entitle to refund with interest if any in accordance with law. [S. 237, 244A(1), 244A(IA), Art.

G. E. Power India Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)458 ITR 450 /(2024) 158 taxmann.com 173 (Bom)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Failure to give effect to remand order of the Tribunal within prescribed time-Assessment order is barred by limitation-Directed to grant refund with interest.[S. 153(3), 153(4), 254(1), Art. 226]

Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)458 ITR 578 /152 taxmann.com 299/ 334 CTR 84/ 225 DTR 270 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Discretion must be exercised judicial manner.[S.220(6), Art. 226]

Sudarshan Reddy Kottur v. ITO (2023) 458 ITR 750 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 194H : Deduction at source-Commission or brokerage-Trade discount-Payment by Television Channels or Newspapers-Advertising Agency-Procuring or canvassing for Advertisements-Not commission-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 260A]

CIT (TDS) v. ABP Pvt. Ltd. (2023)458 ITR 74 /150 taxmann.com 436/ 333 CTR 564 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 158BC : Block assessment-Bonus money and prize money-Cricket Board-Circular withdrawing guidelines for treatment of tour money received by Cricket player cannot be applied retrospectively.[S. 132, 260A]

CIT v. Navjot Singh Sidhu (2023)458 ITR 446 (P&H)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Long term capital gains-Penny stock shares-Matter remanded.[S. 10(38), 132, 147, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

Saloni Prakash Kumar v. ITO (2023)458 ITR 452 /155 taxmann.com 432/335 CTR 782 (Mad)(HC)