This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Reply to initial notice-Assessing Officer directed to proceed after considering reply of assessee. [S. 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]
Virendra Kumar Chourasia v. ITO (2023)458 ITR 431 (MP)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Initial notice need only state issue on basis of which reopening of assessment is proposed-Writ petition is dismissed. [S.2(22)(e), 147 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Satluj Credit And Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 458 ITR 378 / 152 taxmann.com 401 (Mad)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice after three years-Failure to file the return of income-Gross receipt of sale consideration not income chargeable to tax-Notice and consequential orders are quashed.[S. 2(24), 147, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Nitin Nema v. PCIT (2023)458 ITR 690 /155 taxmann.com 276/ 334 CTR 545 (MP)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed , PCCIT . v Nitin Nema (2024)468 ITR 105/ 168 taxmann.com 531 (SC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Followed statutory procedure-Alternative remedy-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Midland Microfin Ltd. v. UOI(2023)458 ITR 36 (P&H)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Reason to believe is sufficient-Not necessary to prove actual escapement of income-Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
ARB Hotels Resorts Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)458 ITR 61/(2024) 296 Taxman 419 (All)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Company ceased to exist-Authorities are aware of amalgamation-Notice is held to be not valid. [S. 147, Art. 226]
RRJ Infra Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)458 ITR 573 / 331 CTR 671/ 224 DTR 418/150 taxmann.com 85 (All)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Transaction has not taken place in previous year-Objection is not considered-Sanction is without application of mind-Notice and order disposing the application is quashed.[S. 133(6), 148, 151, Art. 226]
Sanjay Kumar v. ACIT (2023)458 ITR 548 /151 taxmann.com 158 / 334 CTR 500(Delhi)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Audit objection and factual errors-Capital gains-Agricultural land-Notice is bad in law-Notice and order is quashed. [S. 45, 50C, 148, Art. 226]
Limbabhai Ishwarbhai Jodhani v. ACIT (2023)458 ITR 331/150 taxmann.com 291 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Borrowed satisfaction-change of opinion-Notice without jurisdiction-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed-Writ can be entertained on judicial aspect. [S. 2(40) 142(1), 143(2), 148, Art. 226]
Gandhibag Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 458 ITR 157 /156 taxmann.com 221/(2024)337 CTR 308 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No evidence of failure to disclose material facts-Notice not specifying which facts not disclosed-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 143(3), 148, Art. 226]
Jetair Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)458 ITR 462 / 148 taxmann.com 185 (Bom.)(HC)