This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Tribunal-Power-Limitation-Where Appellate Authority remands case for a determination on a selected issue or aspect of assessment, parties are fully aware of parameters within which fresh enquiry is circumscribed and limited-Rigours of limitation are totally removed-Tribunal had directed Assessing Officer to consider question of disallowance for bad debts/advances being written off-Tribunal’s order did not set aside or cancel subject assessment orders requiring a fresh assessment. [S. 153(2A), 153(6) 153(7) 253, 254(1)]

United Spirits Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 141 /464 ITR 167/ 337 CTR 826 (Karn)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained investments-Act does not contemplate any detailed adjudication on merits of information available with Assessing Officer at stage of passing order under section 148A(d)-Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 69, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Vivek Saran Agarwal v. UOI (2024) 296 Taxman 281 (All.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice-A notice under section 148A(b), dated 30-3-2023, was served upon assessee to file a response by 10-4-2023-Assessee sent a communication dated 14-4-2023 explaining difficulty in filing response by 10-4-2023 as same was served on 14-4-2023-Order passed without considering the reply-Order and notice is set aside.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

E.Construct FZ LLC v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 440 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Co-operative societies-Interest received from Co-Operative banks-Entitle to exemption.[S.2(19), 80P(2) (a)(i), 80P(2)(d), 148A(b), 148A(d), Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act, 1983,, Co-Operative Societies Act, 1912, Art. 226]

Thorapadi Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 296 Taxman 250 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Principle of natural justice-Only two days to file the reply-Order passed is set aside. [S.69C, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Srivenkateshwar Tradex (P.) Ltd. v. P CIT (2024) 296 Taxman 76 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Bogus entry-No transaction is carried out-Order disposing objection and notice is quashed.[S.68, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Tirupati Trading Corporation v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 535 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order passed without providing information gathered from investigation wing-Order and subsequent notice is quashed and set aside.[S. 2((15),12A, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

Chotanagpur Diocesson Trust Asson. v. UOI (2024) 296 Taxman 16 /464 ITR 748 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Annual subscription fee to club-Capital or revenue-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 37(1), 143(1), 148, Art. 226]

Swiss Re Services India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 296 Taxman 190 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Professional fees-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 40(a)(i), 148, Art. 226]

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 117 / 338 CTR 220(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained money-Loans and advances-Investment in Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs)-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 69A, 148, Art. 226]

Koa Investment Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 296 Taxman 311 (Delhi)(HC)