S. 68 : Cash credits-Search-No cash was found-Memorandum of understanding (MoU)-Statement under section 131-Deletion of addition by the Appellate Tribunal was affirmed.[S. 131 132]
PCIT v. Trilok Chand Choudhary (2023) 291 Taxman 462 (Delhi)(HC)S. 68 : Cash credits-Search-No cash was found-Memorandum of understanding (MoU)-Statement under section 131-Deletion of addition by the Appellate Tribunal was affirmed.[S. 131 132]
PCIT v. Trilok Chand Choudhary (2023) 291 Taxman 462 (Delhi)(HC)S. 68 : Cash credits-Proved the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions-Deletion of addition is justified. [S. 260A]
PCIT v. Enrich Agro Food Products (P.) Ltd. (2023) 455 ITR 664 /291 Taxman 606 (Delhi)(HC)S. 54G : Capital gains-Shifting of industrial undertaking from urban area-Sale of an industrial plot in Bengaluru-Urban area-Entitle for the benefit.[S. 45 280Y(d)]
Fabsun Engineering (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 291 Taxman 478 (Karn)(HC) Editorial: Section 280Y, omitted by the Finance Act, 1990, w.e.f 1-4-1990.S. 43D : Public financial institutions-Amendment by the Finance Act, 2017-Interest on sticky loans-Taxable on receipt basis and not on accrual basis. [S. 145]
PCIT v. Kangra Central Co-op Bank Ltd.(2023) 291 Taxman 566 /330 CTR 133/ 221 DTR 1(HP)(HC)S. 40(b)(v) : Amounts not deductible-Partner-Remuneration-Not stipulation in partnership deed-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 260A]
Egg Guard v. ITO (2023) 457 ITR 762/ 291 Taxman 615 /331 CTR 794/ 224 DTR 5 (Telangana)(HC)S. 40(a)(iib) : Amounts not deductible-Surcharge on sales tax or turnover tax paid by assessee-company to State Government was not a ‘fee or charge’-Review petition was dismissed. [S. 37(1)]
ACIT v. Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd (2023) 291 Taxman 357 / 333 CTR 14/ 224 DTR 479 (SC) Editorial : Refer Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 440 ITR 492 / 286 Taxman 1 (SC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Business development-Cash expenses-Genuineness of vouchers was not in dispute-Assessing Officer could not sit in arm chair of a businessman and decide what expenditure was expedient-Assessee was entitled for deduction.
K. Chandrashekar Praskash v. ACIT (2023) 455 ITR 751 / 291 Taxman 217 (Karn)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision-Warranty-Based on past experience-Allowable as a deduction. [S. 145]
TTK Prestige Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 291 Taxman 220 (Karn) (HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Derivative loss-Business loss-Mark-to-market basis-account Foreign exchange fluctuation-Mercantile basis-Allowable as deduction. [S. 28(i), 145]
PCIT v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. (2023) 291 Taxman 562 (Cal)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Education cess-Not allowable as deduction-As per Explanation 3 to the provision of section 40(a)(ii) inserted by Finance Act, 2022 with effect from 1-4-2005 surcharge or cess forms a part of ‘tax’ [S. 40(a)(ii)]
JCIT v. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. (2023) 291 Taxman 438 (SC)