This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 143(3): Assessment-Alternate remedy-Dispute regarding finding of fact-Writ petition dismissed. [S.246A. Art. 226]

Senthil Murugan Jewellers v. ACIT [2023] 152 taxmann.com 534 / (2025) 482 ITR 803 (Mad)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Order passed without considering the reply of the assessee-Assessment order and demand notice was set aside-Directed to pass an order after considering the reply of assessee and after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing.[S. 143(2), 144B, 147, 148, Art. 226]

Chatursinh Javanji Chavda v. ACIT (2024] 162 taxmann.com 466 / (2025) 482 ITR 245 (Guj)(HC)

S. 143(3) :Assessment order-Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional grounds-Revised return-Assessed income below the returned income-Assessing 0fficer cannot deny the deduction relying on the Circular No 549 dt. 30-10-1989 (1990) 182 ITR (St.) 1)-DTAA-India-Japan. [S.9(1)(i), 254(1),Art. 5, 7, Art. 226]

Mitsubishi Corporation. v. ACIT [2024] 165 taxmann.com 79 / (2025) 482 ITR 230 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Failure to produce purchase of material-Scam-Siphoned off funds received from State Government for flood relief-Order of Tribunal disallowing the claim is affirmed. [S. 260A]

Santosh Kumar Jha v. Dy. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 211 (Patna)(HC)

S. 143(2): Assessment-Notice-Order passed after giving proper notice under section 143(2) and adequate opportunity of being heard to assessee-Order valid.[Art. 226]

Angusamy Gounder Subbu Rathinamun v.ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 819 (Mad)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Defect not rectified-Return invalid-Order of rejection u/s 264 is affirmed. [S.44A,139(9), 264, Art. 226]

Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 885 (Ker)(HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Failure to give an opportunity of hearing-Transfer of case not valid. [Art. 226]

Sindhu Shree Charles v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 625 (Mad)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Carry forward of losses-Assessee must prove genuine hardship-Rejection of application for condonation of delay was affirmed. [S.139(1), 139(3), Art. 226]

Gaurangbhai Chimanbhai Kapadiya v. UOI [2024] 161 taxmann.com 304 / (2025) 482 ITR 649 (Guj)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Return-Condonation of delay-Rejection of application for condonation of delay without following guidelines-Not valid. [S. 139, Art. 226]

Abhilash Panda v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 326 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay of 1257 days-Accumulation of income-Form no 10-Delay was condoned-Directed to file application under section 154 of the Act. [S. 11(2), 119(2)(b), R. 17, Form No.10B, Art. 226]

Shree Jain Swetamber Murtipujak Tapagachha Sangh v.CIT(E) [2024] 161 taxmann.com 114 / (2025) 482 ITR 38 (Bom)(HC)