This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Prima facie adjustment-under late payment of employees’ contribution towards PF and ESI-Adjustment is valid-Not allowable as deduction. [S.36(1(va), 37(1), 143(1)(a)]

Checkmate Services (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 230 TTJ 785 / 241 DTR 185 / 38 NYPTTJ 955/ 164 taxmann.com 498 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-comparables-There is no error in the reasons given by the TPO/DRP to include L&T in the final set of comparables-PLR-Interest on outstanding receivable-TPO is directed to adopt appropriate rate of interest by considering the currency in which the outstanding receivable by the assessee and its AE. [S.92B]

Oakton Global Technology Services Centre (India) (P) Ltd. v ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 495 / 240 DTR 158 / 38 NYPTTJ 773 / 163 taxmann.com 769 (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 80G : Donation-Time-limit for filing application for final approval-Form No. 10AB was filed on 23rd Sept., 2023 was well within time i.e., within six months prior to the expiry of the period of provisional approval-Order of the CIT(E) is set aside with direction to pass a fresh order on merits as provided in law. [S.12A(1)(ac)(vi), 80G(5)(iii)]

Indian Red Cross Society v. CIT (E) (2024) 230 TTJ 206 / 239 DTR 167 / 38 NYPTTJ 557/ 162 taxmann.com 194 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 80G : Donation-Time-limit for filing application for final approval-Existing Trust or institution-Applied for permanent registration under S. 80G before the expiry of provisional approval-The application of the assessee was not time-barred-The order under s. 80G is set aside to CIT(E) for de novo adjudication-Speech of the Finance Minster is relevant. [S.12AB, 80G(5)]

Gender Lab Foundation v. CIT (E) (2024) 230 TTJ 878 / 240 DTR 217 / 38 NYPTTJ 548 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposits-Demonetization-Petrol pump-Not violated any provision of law or any Government guidelines-Addition is deleted.

Nazir Ahmad v. ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 78 (UO)(Amritsar)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposit-Demonetization-Sufficient stock-Sales-Sales shown in VAT return-Addition is deleted.

R.M. Sales Corporation v ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 701 / 240 DTR 201 / 38 NYPTTJ 929 / 167 taxmann.com 679 (Amritsar)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Demonetisation-Bank notes-Complete record is maintained-Receipts from the customers cannot be assssed as unexplained.

ITO v. Mayurbhanj Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. (2024) 230 TTJ 655 / 240 DTR 17 / 38 NYPTTJ 807 (Cuttack)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Brokerage on sales-Cannot be considered ad bogus-Books of account not rejected-Recovery from debtor-Advance given in earlier years-Cannot be assessed as cash credits-Business advances-Confirmations filed-Short term advances-Leger account and bank statement is filed-Cannot be assessed as cash credits-Payment made to purchase of goods-Not assessable as cash credits-Credit sales-Cannot be assessed as cash credits.

Trio Mercantile & Trading Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 64 (UO)/ 167 taxmann.com 692 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Loan-Produced confirmation, PANs, bank statements and acknowledgements of IT returns of the lenders-Addition is deleted.

White Willow v. ITO (2023) 37 NYPTTJ 1154 / (2024) 230 TTJ 969 / 240 DTR 193 (Surat)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long tern capital gains-Sale of shares-Penny stock-General report of investigation wing-UD Ltd-Consideration received through online trading through BSE platform-Shares have been credited in the demat account and transferred out of demat account at the time of sale-Denial of exemption is not justified-Sale consideration cannot be assessed as cash credits.[S 10(38), 45, 68 69C]

Rohit Devendra Goyal v. ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 561 / 38 NYPTTJ 477 (Mum) (Trib)