This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Income from other sources-Share premium-Discounted Cash flow (DCF) method-Selected for scrutiny on the ground that large share premium received during relevant assessment year-Assessing Officer accepted the claim-Commissioner was not justified in setting aside order of AO under section 263 on ground that AO had merely accepted claim of share premium without making enquiry with respect to valuation of shares. [S. 36(1)(va), 56(2)(viib),142(1), R.11UA]

Vaaan Infra (P.) Ltd. v. pr. CIT (2024) 205 ITD 331 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Examined all details-Possible view-Revision is not valid.[S. 10(21)]

Synthetic & Art Silk Mills Research Association. v. CIT (2024) 205 ITD 70 (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Donation to political parties-No enquiry was made by the Assessing Officer-Revision is held to be justified.[S.80GGC]

Rakesh Balubhai Padariya v. PCIT (2024) 205 ITD 62 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 255 : Appellate Tribunal-Procedure-Functions-Jurisdiction-Transfer of appeals-Cash credits-Share capital and premium-Commissioner (Appeals), Kolkata deleted addition-Appeal filed by revenue before Gauhati Bench of Tribunal-Appeal is dismissed on ground of lack of jurisdiction. [S. 68, ITAT R, 1963, R. 4]

ACIT v. Front Line Vyapar (P.) Ltd. (2024) 205 ITD 520 /230 TTJ 517 (Gauhati) (Trib.)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Power to recall and to pass any order-Authority letter-Authority to counsel to appear and present before Tribunal-Authority is fullest, unlimited and unrestricted and there is no rider mentioned therein, withdrawal/non-pressing of ground by counsel-Tribunal had accepted withdrawal/non-pressing without authority of counsel is devoid of any merit and is rejected. [S. 254(1)]

Dhanwan Leasing and Finance Co. Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 205 ITD 259(Indore) (Trib.)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Non-speaking order-Procedure-Commissioner (Appeals) has to decide appeal on merit by passing a speaking order and does not have any power to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution.[S.68, 69, 131, 133(6), R.46A]

Meda Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy. v. ACIT (2024) 205 ITD 715 /113 ITR 258 (Panaji) (Trib.)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Income from other sources-Appeal is dismissed without deciding on merits-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) to decide on appeal. [S.56(2)(x)(b), 250(6)]

Rajkumar Anandchand Jain. v. DCIT (2024) 205 ITD 14 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Fringe Benefit tax-Intimation and demand notice concerning FBT demand was ever served-Interest charged under section 220(2) is deleted. [S.115WE, 115WJ,220(2)]

Sony India (P.) Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2024) 205 ITD 194 /227 TTJ 619(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Salaries-Perquisite-Rent free accommodation-Concession-No finding is recorded-Addition is deleted. [S.17(2)(ii), 201(1) R. 3]

ACIT v. Indian Institute of Technology. (2024) 205 ITD 305 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 195 :Deduction at source-Non-resident-Certificate-Survey-Subsequent issue of certificate-Entire remittances that were made to said concern would be non-taxable so far as TDS is concerned-Matter is remanded. [S.133A, 195(3), 201(IA)]

FSL Projects Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 205 ITD 530 (Hyd) (Trib.)