This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 80G : Donation-Commenced its activities much prior to grant of provisional approval under section 80G(5)-Assessee would be entitled to file application for grant of regular approval under section 80G(5) prior to six months of expiry of provisional approval.[S.80G(5), Form No. 10AB]
R.L. Education Sanstha v. CIT (2024) 208 ITD 381 (Pune) (Trib.)
S. 80G : Donation-Failure to appear before CIT(E)-Rejection of application in limine-Matter remanded back to Commissioner for decision afresh on merits. [S.80G(5)]
Asmita Education and Healthcare Foundation. v. CIT (2024) 208 ITD 186 (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Composite trading and profit and loss account-Sales accepted-Failure to response to notices issued by Revenue-s Ad-hoc disallowance of purchase of Milk is deleted.
Madura Biotech (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 699 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Un explained investment-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-Sales accepted-Addition is restricted to gross profit of 6.19%. [S.28(i), 69, 143]
Mahir Diamonds v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 626/114 ITR 80(SN) (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-filed details of purchases made and corresponding quantity of sales made-Entire purchases could not have been added to income-Only profit element can be taxed.
Heena Gems v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 481/114 ITR 30(SN) (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Diary-Cash expenses-Absence of specific details in the affidavit-Addition is affirmed. [S. 132]
Kailash Gahlot. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 25 /113 ITR 62 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposit-Demonetization period-Source explained-Addition is deleted.[S.115BBE]
Dipak Balubhai Patel (HUF) v. ITO 2024] 208 ITD 386/115 ITR 624 (Ahd) (Trib.)
S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Cash deposit of 3 lakh-Returned income of assessee is more than Rs. 50 lakhs, cash deposit of around 3 lakhs could not be treated as unexplained investment.
Ravi Jakhar v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 633 (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-Disallowance is restricted at rate of 6 per cent of bogus purchases-Sale of shares-Explained the source of purchase-Order of CIT(A deleting the addition is affirmed-Reassessment is affirmed.[S. 147, 148]
DCIT v. Center Point Gems (P.) Ltd. (2024) 208 ITD 213 (Surat) (Trib.)
S. 68 : Cash credits-Penny stock-Long term capital gains-Accommodation entries-DMAT-Sale of shares of PS Infrastructure and Services Limited-Addition is deleted-Exemption is allowed.[S. 10(38), 45]
Vikram N. Chandan. v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 723 (Mum) (Trib.)