S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Provision made for future expenditure-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification. [S. 145]
ACIT v. Delhi Buildwell (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 291 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Provision made for future expenditure-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification. [S. 145]
ACIT v. Delhi Buildwell (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 291 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident –Royalty-Payments made towards internet, broadband and bandwidth charges to foreign parties did not constitute royalty-Not liable to deduct tax at source.[S.9(1)(vi), 195]
DCIT v. Hinduja Global Solutions Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 453 (Mum) (Trib.)S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident –Amount paid to a foreign company towards management fees-Tax deducted and deposited-No addition could be made under section 40(a)(i), or the payment can be held to be as unexplained expenditure under section 69C.[S, 69C, 195]
ACIT v. Matrix Publicities and Media India (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 463 (Mum) (Trib.)S.37(1): Business expenditure-Site maintenance expenditure-Ad-hoc disallowance of 30 per cent-Disallowance restricted to 10 percent of expenditure.
Bollineni Developers Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 213 ITD 635 (Hyd)(Trib.)S.37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Licence fee for use of software-Allowable as revenue expenditure.
ACIT v. Matrix Publicities and Media India (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 463 (Mum) (Trib.)S.37(1): Business expenditure-Setting up of business-Actual commencement of revenue-generating activity does not have any bearing on determining the date of setting up of business-Expenses incurred after the date of setting up of business are eligible for deduction. [S.28(i)]
DCIT v. Aricent Technologies (Holding) (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 378 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Unrealised debtors-Write-off-Income offered in the subsequent years when realised-Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition was affirmed.
ACIT v. Delhi Buildwell (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 291 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 36(1)(viia): Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts-Schedule bank-A co-operative bank, eligible for deduction even if it had no rural branches-Long-term finance-Eligible for deduction under section 36(1)(viii).[S. 36(1)(vii)]
ITO v. Sutex Co-operative Bank Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 359 (Surat) (Trib.)S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Working capital loan-Interest-free loans were advanced in earlier years-Interest paid on working capital loan cannot be disallowed.
Laqshya Media Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 213 ITD 588 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Limited scrutiny-Funds invested in short-term deposits-Assessing Officer had travelled beyond the limited scrutiny parameters for which the case was selected-Addition was deleted. [S. 143(3)]
ACIT v. B.K. Sales Corporation. (2025) 213 ITD 559 (Delhi) (Trib.)