This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment order-Limitation-Assessment orders passed beyond period prescribed in S.144C(13) invalid and set aside-Interpretation-When the language of the provision is clear, no external aid of interpretation is required. [S.144C(13), Art. 226]
IBS Software Services Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 478 ITR 114 / 175 taxmann.com 668 (Ker)(HC) Suntec Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 478 ITR 114 / 175 taxmann.com 668 (Ker)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Standard Operating Procedure Period of seven days must be given to respond the notice-Order is quashed and set aside [S. 144B(6)(xi), Art.226]
Cheftalk Food and Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 165 taxmann.com 415 / (2025) 478 ITR 588 (Bom)(HC)
S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Books of account not rejected-Based on departmental valuation Officer’s report-Reference made under section 142A by the Assessing Officer to the Departmental Valuation Officer was not in accordance with law-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 142A, 145, 260A]
PCIT v. Parmarth Iron Pvt. Ltd [2024] 161 taxmann.com 709 / (2025) 478 ITR 452 (All)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Amalgamation-Assessment order passed in name of non-existent assessee amalgamated company after informing Department duly informed about merger-Participation in proceedings no estoppel against law-Assessment order quashed and set aside.[S. 144B, 144C, Art. 226]
Pharmazell (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. NFAC [2024] 161 taxmann.com 484/ (2025) 478 ITR 710 (Mad)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Firm-Additional capital by partners-Fund flow established-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to consider the additional documents provided by the assessee. [S. 68, 142(1), Art. 226]
Sanmar Group Corporate Finance v. AUITD (2025) 478 ITR 568 (Mad)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Principles of natural justice-Covid-19 pandemic-Not granting sufficient opportunity-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to consider afresh after giving due opportunity to assessee.[S. 144B, Art. 226]
Gokul Refoils and Solvent Ltd v. NFAC (2025) 478 ITR 520 (Guj)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Order passed without giving assessee adequate opportunity to cross-examine parties summoned under section 133(6)-Violation of principles of natural justice-Notices and orders not valid-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S.68, 69C, 133(6), 144B, 260A]
A.K. Metals Products v. ACIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 159 (2025) 478 ITR 504 (Guj)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Appeal was filed against assessment order within extended limitation period granted by Supreme Court owing to pandemic-Writ petition dismissed-The assessee was relegated to statutory remedy of appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246A and the Tribunal under section 253.[S. 246A, 253, Art. 226]
Bihar State Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd v. NEAC (2025) 478 ITR 487 (Patna)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Validity-Unable to access Department’s portal-Order quashed-Matter remanded for reconsideration subject to payment of costs of Rs.10000 by assessee to the Adyar Cancer Institute, Chennai. [S. 142(1), Art. 226]
Vijayalakshmi Mohanakrishnan v. NFAC (2025) 478 ITR 470 (Mad)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Allegation that assessee had not been heard not proved-Writ petition dismissed-Given liberty to file statutory appeal.[S. 142(1), 147, 148, 246A, Art. 226]
Devendran Coal International Pvt. Ltd. v.NFAC(2025) 478 ITR 432 (Mad)(HC)