This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 68: Cash credits-Purchase expenditure cannot be assessed as unexplained cash credit or unexplained expenditure where the source of payment is not disputed. [S. 69C, 250]

Feather Infotech (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 1 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S.54F: Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Construction of mosque not a residential house-Not entitled to exemption. [S. 45]

ACIT v. Iqbal Ali Khan [2024] 158 taxmann.com 377 / (2025) 130 ITR 576 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer-Any transaction by way of becoming a member-Joint Development Agreement (JDA)-Unregistered JDA/GPA can still constitute transfer under section 2(47)(vi)-Transfer of 62% land in exchange for 38% developed area taxable in year of agreement-The matter was remanded only for recomputation of capital gains in accordance with sections 48 and 50C. [S. 2(47)(vi), 48, 50C]

K.P. Muhammed Ali v. ITO (IT) (2025) 130 ITR 271 (Cochin)(Trib.)

S.43CA: Transfer of assets-other than capital assets-Full value of consideration-stock in trade-Agreement value-Stamp valuation-Where part consideration is received by account payee cheque on the date of agreement, stamp duty value as on the date of agreement has to be adopted-No addition. Ss. 43CA(3), 43CA(4)[S. 43CA(3), 43CA(4), 50C]

Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. (erstwhile Bellflower Properties P. Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 505 (Trib.)

S. 41(1): Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Outstanding liability cannot be taxed merely because it has become time-barred under the Limitation Act-In the absence of remission or cessation of liability, section 41(1) cannot be invoked. [S. 145]

Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 394 (Ahd)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Compensation paid for surrender of rights is not interest-Disallowance is not justified. [S. 194A]

Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. (erstwhile Bellflower Properties P. Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 505 (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Reimbursement of professional fees and expatriate salary costs to a foreign AE is not liable to TDS where payments do not satisfy the ‘make available’ test under the DTAA and salary costs are reimbursed on a cost-to-cost basis without any profit element.-Not liable to deduct tax at source [S. 9(1)(i), 195]

TPF Getinsa Euroestudios S. L. v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2025) 130 ITR 551 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Employees’ Stock Option Plan (ESOP)-Discount on ESOP-Ascertained liability-Deduction allowable.

Bayer Crop Science Ltd. (Successor to Monsanto India Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 679 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 35: Expenditure on scientific research-Weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) is not allowable in the absence of approval of the in-house research facility and prescribed statutory compliances. [S. 35(1)(iv), 35(2AB)]

Anil Ltd. (formerly Anil Products Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 351 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Administrative expenses-Rule 8D-Disallowance computed by Assessing Officer upheld. [R. 8D(2)(iii)]

Bayer Crop Science Ltd. (Successor to Monsanto India Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 679 (Mum.)(Trib.)