This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment-Limitation-Assessing Officer required to complete assessment within one month from the end of the month in which directions of Dispute Resolution Panel received-Directions of Panel dated 21-9-2021-Final order passed on 18-11-2021, after due date of 31-10-2021-Time-barred-Final assessment order void ab initio. [S. 92CA(3), 92CA(5), 144C(5), 144C(13)]
Rolls Royce India P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 1 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Advertising, marketing and promotion expenses-No agreement with associated enterprise to share/reimburse expenses-Not an international transaction-Addition not justified.-Royalty for trademark separate from royalty for technology-Cannot be clubbed-Adjustment on royalty for technology deleted-Arms length price-To be determined only by one of five prescribed methods-Ad hoc estimation of salary and man-hours not permissible-Adjustment deleted-Income-Disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income-Sufficient own funds available-No disallowance warranted-Direct/indirect expenses remitted for verification-Business loss-Foreign exchange loss on forward contracts terminated by bank on/after maturity, not prematurely cancelled by assessee-Integral to export of goods-Allowable as business loss-Special deduction-Allocation of operating and establishment expenses on ratio of unit’s revenue to total revenue-Method consistently accepted in earlier years-Deduction allowable-Interest-No delay in filing return-No interest under section 234A-Interest under section 234C levied on assessed income instead of returned income-Matter remitted for recomputation. [S. 14A, R. 8D, 28(i),80IC, 234A, 234C]
Mondelez India Foods P. Ltd. (formerly known as Cadbury Ltd.) v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 83 (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 68 : Cash credits –Demonetisation-Cash deposits in bank during demonetisation period-Explanation that deposits were from recorded cash sales-Stocks existing on date of sale, no backdating-Complete stock tally maintained, books audited, no deviation in gross profit ratio, parties identified, proper invoices and VAT returns filed-No evidence of bogus sales-Cash deposits cannot be treated as unexplained income. [S. 115BBE]
Lalit R Jagawat HUF v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 192 (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 43B : Deduction only on actual payment-Rectification of mistakes-Gratuity amount incorrectly claimed under wrong schedule in return-Not reflected in tax audit report-Centralised Processing Centre disallowing claim under section 143(1)-Assessee filing revised tax audit report-Genuine claim could not be denied-CBDT Circular-Income of assessee should not be over-assessed-Legitimate deduction not to be denied merely because of a mistake made by assessee. [S. 143(1), 154]
National Contracting Co. (India) P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 185 (Chennai) (Trib.)
S. 43B : Deduction only on actual payment-Unpaid interest on loan from World Bank-Section 43B(d), (da), (e) covering only interest payable to specific financial institutions, non-banking financial companies, scheduled banks or co-operative banks-World Bank or State Government loans not included-Disallowance deleted-Deduction only on actual payment-Statutory liability-Electricity duty collected from consumers but not remitted to Government-Assessee merely a conduit between consumer and Government-No independent liability-Disallowance rightly deleted.[S.43B(a), 43B(d), 43B(da), 43B(e)]
Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 134 (Jaipur) (Trib.)
S. 28(i): Business loss-Assessee a share trader and investor-Losses from share transactions including listed securities-Assessing Officer disallowing claim treating shares as penny stocks-Assessee transacting huge volumes of shares-Addition made on basis of preconceived idea after general investigation of investigating authority-Order set aside and addition quashed. [S. 45, 69]
Vicky Fincon P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 18 (Kol.)(Trib.)
S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Exemption-Capital gains-Sale proceeds reinvested in fixed deposit with scheduled bank-Deemed acquisition of new capital asset-Assessee eligible for exemption on capital gains-Interest earned on fixed deposits retained in bank account and applied for charitable purposes-Qualifies for exemption. [S. 11(5), 11(IA)]
Vaishnav Samaj Trust v. ITO (2025) 132 ITR 169 (Surat)(Trib.)
S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement not affected by amendments in Act-Assessee entitled to advantage of provisions under Agreement-Assessee a non-resident telecommunication operator providing international carriage and connectivity services in Sri Lanka-Interconnect user charges not royalty-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-Sri Lanka.[S. 9(1)(vi), Explns. 2, 5, 6, 147 , arts. 7, 12]
Dialog Axiata PLC v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 43 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 45: Capital gains – Income from other sources – Transfer of Development Rights — Compensation received under a redevelopment agreement is assessable as Capital Gains and not as Income from Other Sources. Exemption under section 54EC is allowable. [ S. 2(14), 2(47), 54EC, 56, 50C & 147)
Sherlyn Dias (Mrs.) (Legal Heir of Late Mrs. Dorothy Lawrence Pereira) v. ITO (Mum.)(Trib.),
S. 80IB: Industrial undertakings – Special category States –
– Research & Development (R&D) expenditure – Allocation of R&D expenses to eligible manufacturing units – No allocation permissible in the absence of direct nexus between R&D activity and eligible units – Revenue’s appeal dismissed. [S. 35(2AB), 80IC , 260A)
Pr. CIT v. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Bom.)(HC)(www.itatonline.org .