This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Provisions Of Section 13 can be invoked only at time of assessment while considering eligibility for exemption and not at time of grant of registration-Order of CIT(E) is set aside and matter remanded for de novo consideration.[S. 11, 12, 12A, 13(3)]
National Real Estate Development Council, Gujarat v. CIT (E) (2024) 113 ITR 63 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)
S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution-Donations to charitable institutions-Purchase of land and financial assistance to improve healthcare education and services and to uplift standard of living of Tribals-Order of rejection is set aside-Matter remanded to the CIT(E) to decide a fresh in accordance with law. [S. 12A(1)(ac)(ii), 80G(5)]
Karamshi Jethabhai Somaiya (Delhi) Trust v. CIT (E) (2024)113 ITR 79 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)
S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution-Assessment proceedings-Pendency of application for registration-Registration is granted-Denial of exemption on ground registration granted was prospective and not applicable for Assessment year in question is not proper-Only the profit can be taxed and not the entire receipt if benefit of section 11 is to be denied-Adjustment under section 143(1) is bad in law. [S.11, 12A(2), 12AA, 143(1)]
Indian Medical Association v. Jt. CIT (Appeals) (2024)113 ITR 60 (SN)(Pune)(Trib)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Accumulation of income-Application of income-Non-corpus fund shown at figure higher than investment shown-Matter remanded for fresh adjudication. [S. 2(15), 11(2),11(5), 13(1)(d)]
Vaidic Dharma Sansthan v.Dy. CIT (E) (2024)113 ITR 1 (SN) (Bang)(Trib)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Filing of audit report-Form No 10B was filed before passing of the intimation-Denial of exemption is not valid-Fee for late filing-Filed return within prescribed time-limit-Late fee is not leviable. [S.139(1),143(1),234F, Form No 10B]
Shiksha Foundation v. ITO (E) (2024)113 ITR 14 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Accumulation of income-Filing of audit report in Form 10B-Before due date of filing of return-Not mandatory-Filed along with the return-Direction of CIT(A) is affirmed.[S.11(2), 139(1), Form,10B]
Dy. CIT (E) v. Gujarat State Board of School Text Book (2024)113 ITR 33 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)
S. 10B: Export oriented undertakings-Manufacture or processing-Preparation and export of pickles-Change in characteristic of raw materials from vegetables to bottled pickle, with different use-New product Entitled to benefit-Entire sale proceeds must be received in convertible foreign exchange within stipulated time-Bank realisation certificates, certified statement of forex receipts and certificate of auditor establishing realisation of export proceeds-Eligible for deduction to extent of foreign exchange received during specified period-Entitle to deduction. [S.80IC]
ITO v. M. M. Poonjiaji Spices Ltd. (2024)113 ITR 294/230 TTJ 312 (Mum)(Trib)
S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Royalty-Non-Resident-Information technology and systems, applications and products service agreement with Indian subsidiary-Receipt is not fees for technical services and not taxable in India-DTAA-India-Portugal. [S.9(1)(vi), Art.12(4)(a), 12(4)(b), 13]
Netafim Ltd. v .Dy. CIT (IT) (2024)113 ITR 548 (Delhi)( Trib)
S. 9(1)(vii):Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Salary-Expatriate employees-Tax deducted at source-Reimbursed by Indian subsidiary on cost-to-cost basis-Reimbursement is not taxable-Not fees for technical services -Not liable for tax deduction at source-DTAA-India-Japan. [S. 192, 195, Art. 12]
Advics Co. Ltd. v .ACIT (2024)113 ITR 147/ 232 TTJ 178 (Delhi) (Trib)
S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty Deduction at source-Non-resident-Sponsorship agreement-Payment for right to use and display event marks-Having non-exclusive right to use footage relating to events or matches which recipients owned-Not royalty-Allowed refund of excess tax-DTAA-India-Singapore. [S. 195 , Art. 7(1), 12(3)]
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (IT) (2024)113 ITR 403 (Mum)(Trib)