This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Income from forex Transaction, Insurance claim, miscellaneous income-Not eligible deduction-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 80HHC, 148, Art. 226]

Super Spinning Mills Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 55 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained investment-Purchase of house-Payment was made prior to sale existing house-Not examined the source of investment in new house-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 54, 59, 148, Art. 226]

N.S. Srinivasan v. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 118 /( 2022) 440 ITR 367/ 211 DTR 327/ 325 CTR 521 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Method of accounting-Professional income-Notice issued on the basis of statement of a manger (Operations)-Re assessment notice is held to be justified. [S. 145, 148, Art. 226]

Dr. Sajan Hedge v. ACIT (2021) 283 Taxman 144/ (2022) 440 ITR 389 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years–Capital gains-Sale of rural agricultural land-No query was raised in the original assessment proceedings as regards applicability of section. 50C of the Act-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 45, 50C, 148, Art. 226]

Premalata Soni v. NESC (2021) 283 Taxman 416/207 DTR 149/323 CTR 489 (MP)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Retention money-Contractor-Contingent-Allowed as deduction-No full and true disclosure-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 28(i), 148, Art. 226]

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd. v. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 60 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Deduction of tax at source-Non-Resident-Lessor deduction of tax at source-New information-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 148, 195, Art. 226]

Cairn India Ltd v. Dy. DIT (IT) (2021) 283 Taxman 243 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Additional stamp duty-Not mentioning the built-up area-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice was held to be not valid. [S. 45, 5OC, 148, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, S. 47A, 70(2)]

CIT v. John Ettimootil Samuel (2021) 283 Taxman 39 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Search-Accommodation entries-Bogus capital gains-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 45, 68, 131, 132, 143(3), 148, 153A, Art. 226]

Bharatkumar Kalubhai Ghadiya v. ACIT (2021) 283 Taxman 254 / (2022) 209 DTR 291 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Purchase and sales-Commission income was not disclosed-Information from investigation Wing-Direct nexus and live link-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Geetaben Dineshchandra Gupta v. ITO (2021) 208 DTR 154 / 129 taxmann.com 346 / (2022)441 ITR 698 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Seeking clarification-Retention money-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 148, Art. 226]

S.Subrahmanyan Constructions Co. (P.) Ltd. v. A CIT (2021) 439 ITR 600/ 207 DTR 289/ (2022) 324 CTR 282 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge in Subrahmanyan Constructions Co. Ltd. v. CIT (2021) 439 ITR 589/ 207 DTR 296 / (2022) 324 CTR 274 (Mad)(HC), is set aside.