This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Operational staff and the Vessel and the captain of the vessel who originally belonged to the non-resident company and who had been sent to work under the complete control and supervision of the Assessee did not constitute a business connection for the non-resident in India-Article 5 of the OECD Model Convention.

Jaisu Shipping Co. v. ADDI (2024) 111 ITR 601 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Loans and advances-Regular business transactions-Not share holder-Not taxable as deemed dividend.

Apeejay P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 111 ITR 231 (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Business nexus and business exigency of entire transaction proved-Advance could not be construed as the receipt of dividend.

Ambey Capital P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 111 ITR 4(SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 2(14)(iii) : Capital asset-Agricultural land-Capital gains-Land not situated within jurisdiction of Municipality-Population of village was 907 persons as per latest published census of 2011-Long term capital gains on sale of land cannot be taxed as capital gains. [S. 2(14)(iii)(a), 45, 54F]

Kulwant Singh v. ITO (2024) 112 ITR 719 / 165 taxmann.com 383. (Chd)(Trib.)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment –Show cause notice less than 7 days -Personal hearing through video conference is not granted – All replies are considered – Alternative remedy – Writ petition is dismissed .[S,143(3), Art. 226 ]

Anandkumar Rathod v. UOI. WP/1147/2023(Bom.)(HC) www.itatonline.org .

S. 68 : Cash credits – Purchase and sales through book entries with sub -broker -Commodity exchange – Futures Speculative transactions- Forward market commission-Accommodate bogus loss- Transaction with sub -broker – Addition is deleted .

Vijay Maneklal Banushali v. ITO ( Mum)( Trib)(www.itatonline .org

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Belated filing of return – Denial of exemption is not justified- Addition made under Section 143(1)(a)(ii) of the Act is deleted – Directed to accept the returned income- Circular of CBDT is binding on Revenue .[ S. 12,12A(1)(b),119, 139(1),139(4) ,143(1)(a)(ii)]

Shri Panchmurti Education Society v. ITO ( Nag )( Trib) www.itatonline .org .

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes- Circular – Condonation of delay of 1585 days – Revised return – Principle of natural justice -No personal hearing was granted – In the absence of any provision to the contrary, such principles should be read into the unoccupied interstices of a statute- Order of rejection is set aside and directed to pass the order after granting the personal hearing . [ S.119(2)(b), 139(5) Art. 226 ]

Bharat Education Society v. UOI ( Bom( HC) www.itatonline .org

Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 .
S. 2 (1)(u): “Proceeds of crime” means any property derived or obtained directly by property derived or obtained directly or indirectly ,by any person as a result of criminal activity relating to a schedule offence or value of any such property – Offence of money laundering – Punishment for money -laundering – Allowing the Criminal Revision application the Court awarded exemplary cost Rs 1 lakh each on complainant and Enforcement Director ( ED) for invoking criminal action and harassing the Developer with criminal action – Breach of agreement – Purchaser and Developer –Law Enforcement Agencies like ED should conduct them selves within parameters of law and that they cannot take law in to their own hands without application of mind and harass citizens. [S. 3, 4, Indian Penal Code 1860 , S 120B, 406 , 418 , 420 ]

Rakesh Brijal Jain v. State of Maharashtra ( Bom)( HC) (UR)

Goods and Service Tax Act , 2017
S.73 :Determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud or any wilful -misstatement or suppression of facts – Challenge against show cause notice under the CGST – Writ against show cause notice is dismissed – Alternative remedy –No violation of principle of natural justice – Frivolous petition only to avoid recourse to statutory remedy and take its chance with filing petition in High Court – Cost of Rs 5 lakh is awarded on the petitioner to be paid to the Maharashtra Legal Services Authority within four weeks. . [ Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Art . 226 ]

Viswaat Chemicals Ltd. v.UOI (2024) 167 taxmann.com 450/91GSTL 114/106 GST 818 Bom)( HC) www.itatonline.org