This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Failure to give an opportunity of hearing-Transfer of case not valid. [Art. 226]

Sindhu Shree Charles v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 625 (Mad)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Carry forward of losses-Assessee must prove genuine hardship-Rejection of application for condonation of delay was affirmed. [S.139(1), 139(3), Art. 226]

Gaurangbhai Chimanbhai Kapadiya v. UOI [2024] 161 taxmann.com 304 / (2025) 482 ITR 649 (Guj)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Return-Condonation of delay-Rejection of application for condonation of delay without following guidelines-Not valid. [S. 139, Art. 226]

Abhilash Panda v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 326 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay of 1257 days-Accumulation of income-Form no 10-Delay was condoned-Directed to file application under section 154 of the Act. [S. 11(2), 119(2)(b), R. 17, Form No.10B, Art. 226]

Shree Jain Swetamber Murtipujak Tapagachha Sangh v.CIT(E) [2024] 161 taxmann.com 114 / (2025) 482 ITR 38 (Bom)(HC)

S. 115JB : Company-Book profit-Provision for doubtful loans and advances Loss-Actual and certain-No upward adjustment required. [S.115JB(2)(c)]

PCIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd (2025) 482 ITR 599 (Cal)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparables-Transfer Pricing Officer, including high brand value companies-Functional similarity alone not decisive factor-Exclusion of such comparables in subsequent assessment year-Direction to exclude the two comparables.[S.92CA]

Cadence Design Systems (India) v. Dy. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 122 (/ (2025) 482 ITR 415 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Cash purchases and receipts for job work on the basis of seized document Estimation of gross profit at 8 per cent.-Question of fact-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 132, 260A]

Kanahaya Metal Works v. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 792 (P & H) (HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Difference in stock-Reconciliation was filed-Order of Tribunal affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. Madras Pharmaceuticals [2024] 167 taxmann.com 108 / (2025) 482 ITR 522 (Mad)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Shares-Failure to prove genuineness of transaction-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 132, 133A, 153C, 260A]

Smriti Television Media and Films Pvt. Ltd. (through its managing director Bipin Goswami) v. PCIT [2023] 151 taxmann.com 323 / (2025) 482 ITR 737 (MP)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Principle of natural justice-Assessee must be given adequate opportunity to be heard and also to cross-examine witnesses whose statements have been relied on to make additions. [S. 260A]

Sree Trading Corporation. v. ITO [2023] 151 taxmann.com 486 / (2025) 482 ITR 712 (Telengana)(HC)