This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-Accommodation entries-Information based on search action-Reassessment is valid-Depreciation-Disallowance is justified-Income from undisclosed sources-Addition is justified. [S. 32(1)(ii), 143(1), 148]

PNK Space Development P. Ltd. v ITO (2024)110 ITR 71 (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Eligible assessee-Draft assessment order-Assessing Officer in final order not empowered to make any other addition not proposed in draft assessment order. [S. 144C(1), 144C(5), 114C(13)]

Mobase India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (NEAC) (2024)110 ITR 55 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Non-Resident-Permanent Establishment-Matter remanded to DRP-DTAA-India-USA [S. 143(3), Art. 5(4)]

Automation Anywhere Inc. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024)110 ITR 46 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Eligible assessee-Draft assessment order-Assessing Officer passing final assessment without passing a draft assessment order-Final assessment order invalid.[S.144C(13)]

Marriott International Inc. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024) 110 ITR 714 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-International Transactions-Eligible assessee-Remand by Tribunal with direction to consider additional ground raised by assessee-Assessing Officer passing final assessment order without passing order is void ab initio.[S. 254(1)]

Marriott International Inc. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 632 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Limitation-Eligible assessee-Directions of Dispute Resolution Panel-Date of uploading of order of Panel on ITBA Portal is deemed date of receipt by National E-Assessment Centre-Limitation to be reckoned from that date-Due date for framing final assessment order not automatically extended-Barred by limitation. [S.130, 144B(5) 144B(6)((v), 144C(13), Information Technology Act, 2000, S. 13]

Microsoft Corporation (India) P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)110 ITR 69 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-Sundry creditors-No discrepancy in purchase of gods or payment-Purchases and sales accepted-Entire addition of opening balance in sundry creditors is deleted. [S.133(6), 143(2)]

Rameshwar Shaw v. ITO (2024)110 ITR 33 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Protective assessment-Lack of confirmation from parties sourcing funds for land purchase-Subsequent substantive assessment in hands of payers becoming final-Addition of same amount in hands of assessee is invalid.[S.69C, 153A]

Bhavesh Commotrade P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 180 (Ranchi)(Trib) ACIT v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal (2024)) 110 ITR 180 (Ranchi)(Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Search And Seizure-Unexplained cash credits-Creditworthiness, genuineness and identity proved-No evidence available for creditors in other assessment years from 2014-15 to 2018-19-Additions are deleted.[S.68, 132]

Bee Pee Rollers P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 402 (Cuttack (Trib) Bajrangbali Re-Rollers P.Ltd v. Asst. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 402 (Cuttack (Trib) Bajrangbali Steel Industries P.Ltd v. Asst. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 402 (Cuttack (Trib)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Additional ground-Notice issued by Assessing Officer not having required Jurisdiction-Assessment order is quashed.[S. 143(3)]

Monarch And Qureshi Builders v. Asst. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 76 (Mum)(Trib)