This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Payment to Mosque for free lunch to Assessee’s employees-Mosque not under control of assessee-Free Lunch not provided exclusively to Labourers of assessee-Not allowable as deduction.
M. D. Noorudin Zariwala v. CIT(Appeals) (2022) 96 ITR 43 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Subscription paid to different committees and associations in local vicinity-Allowable as deduction-Excess amount paid as written off-Matter remanded.
Welkin Telecom Infra (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 475 (Kol) (Trib)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Interest on debentures or compulsorily convertible debentures-Added to work in progress-Builder-Excess interest is required to be added back proportionately to total income as and when corresponding amount of work-in-progress reversed on sale of Flats/Plots [S. 145]
City Corporation Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 96 ITR 246 (Pune) (Trib)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Accrued or Contingent Liability-Provision for warranty-Ad-hoc basis-Not deductible.
BGR Energy Systems Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 96 ITR 625 (Chennai) (Trib)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Commission expenditure-Mere inability to furnish the confirmation letters from the parties commission payment cannot be disallowed.
Dy.CIT v. Atlas Copco (India) Ltd (No.1) (2022) 96 ITR 520 (Pune)(Trib) Dy. CIT v. Atlas Copco (India) Ltd (No.2) (2022) 96 ITR 566 (Pune)(Trib)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Education cess on secondary and higher education cess-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 40(a)(ii)]
United Spirits Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)97 ITR 272 (Bang) (Trib)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenditure on sponsoring sports-Allowable as revenue expenditure.
United Spirits Ltd v. Dy CIT (2022) 97 ITR 272 (Bang)(Trib)
S.37(1): Business expenditure-Foreign travel-Disallowance of Rs. 2.5 lakh confirmed.
M. V. A. Seetharama Raju v Dy. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 714 (Chennai) (Trib)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Redeemable gift vouchers-No evidence doubting genuineness of the expenditure-Disallowance is not justified.
ACIT v. Rohit and Co. (2022)97 ITR 223 (Kol)(Trib)