S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Coal handling charges-Matter remanded-Delay of 1234 days in filing the appeal was condoned. [S. 40(a)(ia) 254(1)]
Srimaan Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 213 DTR 105 / 217 TTJ 120 (Hyd.)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Coal handling charges-Matter remanded-Delay of 1234 days in filing the appeal was condoned. [S. 40(a)(ia) 254(1)]
Srimaan Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 213 DTR 105 / 217 TTJ 120 (Hyd.)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Commission payment-Consultancy charges-TDS was deducted-Payment by account cheque-Failure to provide the nature of service rendered-Disallowance of payment was affirmed.
Akik Tiles Pvt Ltd. v. JCIT (2022) 95 ITR 77 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Commission-Documents produced-Direct nexus between commission paid and income generated-Even in the absence of any agreement with the commission agent, simply introducing or referring potential customers the commission payment is allowable as deduction.
Dy. CIT v. Ganges International P. L td (2022) 95 ITR 161Chennai) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Product development expenses-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Provision for customer claims-Matter restored to Assessing Officer to examine claim in accordance with principles laid down by Supreme Court-Provision for bad and doubtful debts–Matter restored to Assessing Officer.
SKF Engineering and Lubrication India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 95 ITR 24 (Bang)(Trib)S .37(1) : Business expenditure-Short fall in inventory written off-Allowable as deduction-Purchase of tools allowable as revenue expenditure-Provision for warranty-Allowable as deduction-Lability for erection and commissioning placed upon shoulders of assessee-Provision at rate of one per cent. to three per cent. determined on basis of past experience-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 28(1)]
Bharat Fritz Wermer Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2022) 95 ITR 507 (Bang) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Prior period expenses-Payments were made when actual bills received after crystallisation of expenditure-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]
VRL Logistics Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)95 ITR 221 (Bang)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Additional payment to avoid litigation-Deduction not claimed-Disallowance is not warranted.
Rainbow Promoters (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)95 ITR 232 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Diversion by overriding title-Matter remanded. [S. 40A(2)]
Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. ITO (2022)96 ITR 72 (SN) (Pune)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Ceremony expenses-Disallowance at 30 Per Cent is held to be justified.
Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. ITO (2022)96 ITR 72 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Travelling expenses-Personal use-Disallowance of 20 Per Cent. for personal use is held to be justified.
M. D. Noorudin Zariwala v. CIT(Appeals) (2022) 96 ITR 43 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)