This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Surrender of undisclosed income-Satisfaction recorded in the assessment order-Notice valid-Matter remanded to Tribunal to decide on merits.[S.132, 153A, 260A, Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c), 274]

PCIT v. Thakur Prasad Sao and Sons Pvt. Ltd. [2024] 163 taxmann.com 449 /(2025) 482 ITR 168 (Cal)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Long term capital gains-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 45, 54F, 260A]

PCIT v. Dineshchandra Narharishankar Upadhyay (2025) 482 ITR 350 /173 taxmann.com 835 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, PCIT v. Dineshchandra Narharishankar Upadhyay (2025) 304 Taxman 609 / 482 ITR 359 (SC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Presumptive basis-Order of Tribunal affirming the revision is affirmed. [S.44DA, 260A]

Harjot Singh v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 335 (P & H) (HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Understatement of closing stock-Order of revision based on suspicion-Not valid-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S.260A]

CIT v. Gopal Sharma (2025) 482 ITR 226(Cal)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Loans and advances-DDIT Investigation report-Shell companies-No discussion in the assessment order-Effect of insertion of Explanation to section 263 with effect from 1-6-2015-Revision order affirmed-Order of Tribunal set aside.[S. 68, 143(3), 260A, Explanation 2.]

PCIT v. Paramount Propbuild Pvt. Ltd [2024] 161 taxmann.com 85 / (2025) 482 ITR 61 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue Reassessment-Finding of Tribunal that reasons supplied to assessee were not same reasons recorded and found in assessment record and that order of reassessment was not valid-Finding that since reassessment order itself was not validly passed, revision thereof by Principal Commissioner was invalid-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 147, 148 Art. 136]

PCIT v. Bulbul Agrawal.(2025) 482 ITR 279 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Badal Prakash Jindal (HUF) (2023) 457 ITR 345 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Affidavit-Copy of second paper book served on respondents-No denial of averment of assessee in petition that second paper book filed-Tribunal rejecting miscellaneous application without considering second paper book-Order of Tribunal quashed, remanded to Tribunal for consideration of second paper book.[S. 254(1), Art. 226]

Biryas Finance and Investments Pvt. Ltd v.ITO (2025) 482 ITR 927 (Bom)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Ex-parte order by the Tribunal-Principle of natural justice-Duty to grant assessee adequate opportunity to be heard-Order of Tribunal set aside.[S.260A]

Ayub (S/O. Abdul Khadar Tamatgar) v Jt. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 206 (Karn)(HC)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Order remanded to Assessing Officer by Tribunal-Consequential order passed by Assessing Officer-On appeal Commissioner (Appeals) can consider matter on merits and is not bound by order of remand.[S. 254(1) 260A]

Vijay Sehgal v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 331 (P & H) (HC)

S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Appealable orders-National Faceless Appeal Centre Delay in disposal of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)-Directions issued to expedite adjudication of appeal within stipulated period. [S. 250, Art. 226]

Suparshva Swabs (I) v. NFAC (2025) 482 ITR 342 (Delhi)(HC)