S. 80G: Donation-Delay of 27 days in filing application for registration-Delay condoned and matter was remanded back to CIT (E) for fresh adjudication. [S. 12A]
Baburao Chandere Social Foundation. v. CIT (2025) 213 ITD 433 (Pune) (Trib.)S. 80G: Donation-Delay of 27 days in filing application for registration-Delay condoned and matter was remanded back to CIT (E) for fresh adjudication. [S. 12A]
Baburao Chandere Social Foundation. v. CIT (2025) 213 ITD 433 (Pune) (Trib.)S. 80G: Donation-University-Approved under section 10(23C)(vi)-Nature of activities of assessee being charitable in nature could not be disputed while granting approval under section 80G(5)-Order of Commissioner rejecting the application was quashed and set aside. [S.10(23C)(vi, 80G(5)]
Mahindra University. v. CIT (E) (2025) 213 ITD 153 (Hyd.)(Trib.)S. 80G: Donation-Bona fide error-Selecting sub-clause (iv) instead of sub-clause (ii)-Matter was remanded to the CIT(E) to grant approval. [S.10(23C), 11, 12, 80G(5)(iv)(B), Form 10AB]
Senior Citizen Council Gandhinagar. v. DCIT (2025) 213 ITD 16 (Ahd) (Trib.)S. 80G: Donation-Non-compliance on notices-Failure to give sufficient opportunity-Matter remanded to CIT (E). [S.11, 12A, 80G(5)]
Sai Seva Sansthan. v. CIT (2025) 213 ITD 12 (Lucknow) (Trib.)S. 80G: Donation-Medical relief-Medical facilities-Lab testing facility-Charitable activity-Eligible for approval.[S. 2(15), 11, 80G(5)]
Matha Medical Centre Trust. v. CIT (E) (2025] 213 ITD 76 /237 TTJ 613 (Chennai) (Trib.)S. 80G: Donation-Error in filing of Form 10AB-Matter remanded back for de novo consideration [S 11, 12, 80G(5)(iv)(B)]
Aatman Foundation. v. CIT (E) (2025) 213 ITD 8 (Ahd.)(Trib.)S. 72: Carry forward and set-off of business losses-Depreciable assets-Business loss short-term capital gains-Disallowance of set-off by CPC was affirmed-Matter remanded to the file of Assessing Officer to consider the Judgment in PCIT v. Alcon Developers (2020) 432 ITR 277 (Bom)(HC).[S. 50, 143(1)]
Pradeep Kisanlal Boob. v. ACIT (2025) 213 ITD 285//238 TTJ 1032 (Pune) (Trib.)S. 69A: Unexplained money-Search-Gold jewellery-Found 1810 grams-CBDT Circular No.1916/1994, dated 11-05-1994-Exemption was allowed to the extent of 1700 grams as per the circular of CBDT-Addition was to be made towards the value of jewellery to the extent of 110 grams. [S. 132]
Kiran Kumr Reddy. v. DCIT (2025) 213 ITD 490 (Hyd) (Trib.)S. 68: Cash credits-Immovable property-Transaction was reflected in both TDS return and Sub-Registrar’s report-Failure to respond to notices-Assessing Officer made additions on both, treating them as separate transactions-Matter was to be remanded for fresh examination.[S. 144, 194IA]
Om Prakash Girgaonkar. v. ITO (2025) 213 ITD 675 (Bang) (Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Search-documents seized-Share application money along with its premium was bogus-Addition was justified. [S. 132]
Creative Capital Services (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 213 ITD 645 (Chd) (Trib.)